As consumers get ready for the new iPhone 6 coming out this month, the continuous race of technology companies trying to outdo one another continues. Some, techies are already predicting what Apple is holding back for the iPhone 6s version. Yet, with all this bombardment of new devices with smaller chips, faster processors, and fancier and clearer screens, we tend to overlook the true cost of what goes in to make these devices possible.
The role of technology saturating our everyday lives is the new norm and every six months or so we hear of a new device, app, system, platform, or idea that will help make our lives a little better. It’s true that technology has made the world more convenient for lots of people. Our instant connection with people half a world away and ease with which apps help us decide where to eat, how to look up obscure movie names, and get our job done quicker, have all been little breakthroughs that everyone can appreciate. But we never stop to think of how the devices we carry around are produced and made, or what kind of factory conditions the people putting it together work in. We use these devices for a while and exchange them for new ones at the hint of the latest edition.
The iPhones are lining shelves as customers already wait in long lines to grab the newest device, while thousands of other customers are waiting on backorder since there isn’t enough supply for the demand. Yet, even with this height of demand, these companies aren’t capable of paying everyone down the chain properly. Apple is not the only company at fault for this. Since the Foxconn suicides (which house other companies like Dell, Samsung, and Microsoft) Apple products were the most famous of the Foxconn debacle. Apple and its idol, Steve Jobs, could do no wrong in the public eyes, yet, Jobs was the one who made labor conditions so poor not just for the factory workers overseas, but even at home by breaking anti-trust laws and keeping the pay of software engineers low as possible.
With Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Sony, and various other electronic companies making huge profits with every new device they come out with, it seems logical that the profit would at least trickle down to more livable situations for the workers overseas. Yet, that’s not the case. Some may argue that companies like Apple and their contracts with Foxconn help the people in other countries, even with little pay. The problem comes when we use that as an excuse and ignore the inhumane working conditions. Yet, as globalization expanded in the ’80s and ’90s to the mess it is today, people didn’t think to question the lower prices in technology or the disappearing manufacture jobs back home.
Apple is the main subject because the iPhone is such a big deal and takes over the news every time a new phone or product comes out. Go to any message board and you’ll find Apple fans “who can’t wait another week” to get the new phone even though they have the 5s(which came out last September). The large following that Apple has succeeded in producing and the rate at which these consumers buy any new product the company makes, reveals the failure of the company to use that ability to properly pay its employees. Settling ever for more “profit” for themselves while trickling the pennies to its labor below.
Without change, the suicides will continue (their numbers may be smaller, but they’re still occurring), workers will become more agitated and demand unions to be formed in effort to build a stronger voice for labor. Whether the prices in our technology change, or the process through which we make them, or just merely acknowledging the source at which our lovely devices are made will help set up a path toward changing the situation.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.