Skip to content Skip to footer

The Coming War on Net Neutrality

The media have largely ignored Trump’s appointment of Ajit Pai to chair the Federal Communications Commission even though he opposes their regulations.

Want to see more stories like this one? A free, unbought press has never been more necessary or more under threat. Support Truthout with a donation today!

Donald Trump and the Republican Party won’t need US Senate approval to destroy net neutrality in America.

While Trump has signed a flurry of executive actions this week, the media have largely ignored Trump’s appointment of Ajit Pai to chair the Federal Communications Commission.

And because Pai is already a member of the FCC, he won’t need Senate approval for his new position.

Pai is a staunch opponent of FCC regulations.

He recently spoke at the Free State Foundation about removing so-called “unnecessary” regulations, declaring that “We need to fire up the weed whacker and remove those rules that are holding back investment, innovation, and job creation.”

But net neutrality doesn’t threaten freedom or hold back investment — net neutrality keeps the Internet the way we’ve always known it: everyone’s online content and services are treated the exact same way as anyone else’s, no matter whether the creator is a tech-savvy amateur or a giant multinational like Microsoft.

You’re not hearing about this in the mainstream media in large part because MSNBC and CNN are owned by Comcast and Time Warner, two companies that stand to cash in big if net neutrality is destroyed.

A reddit user named Quinky created a graphic several years ago showing how without net neutrality, a fictional service provider named Telco might offer a basic service for $29.95 a month, but that will only get a user access to very, very basic websites.

See more news and opinion from Thom Hartmann at Truthout here.

Want to do a little research under Telco’s plan? That’ll cost you another $5 a month to use any search engines.

Want to read USA Today? That’s another $5 package for US news, and if you want to read the BBC? That’ll be another $5 for foreign news.

How about your favorite sports and cat videos on ESPN and YouTube? Guess what? That’s another $10.

Want to do some online shopping? It’ll cost you $5 to even see what’s in stock on Amazon or Ebay.

If Americans are struggling to stay informed now, wait until people have to budget their hard earned money between reading the news, online shopping or watching YouTube.

We used to live in a world where only the rich could afford to be informed before Benjamin Franklin established the Library Company in Philadelphia. Books were only available to the rich and wealthy. But Franklin’s Library allowed anybody, regardless of class, access to information stored in books.

In the 21st century, the information infrastructure of the Internet has largely replaced old brick-and-mortar libraries, so much so that Canada’s telecom agency recently declared that high-speed internet is a basic service “necessary to the quality of life” of all Canadians.

So why are Trump and the Republicans trying to take us back to a time when only aristocrats could afford to be informed?

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.