On Friday, lawmakers in the Texas House passed a bill that would allow certain election workers to carry handguns in a proposal that voting rights advocates say would decrease voter participation and create an atmosphere of intimidation at polling sites.
The Republican-sponsored bill would allow election judges, or the presiding officer at a polling place, and some poll workers to carry handguns at polling sites on Election Day and during early voting. The bill, H.B. 636, passed 95 to 50 on Friday, with several Democrats joining Republicans in voting “yes.”
The proposal now heads to the state Senate, where its fate is unclear. The Texas house passed a similar bill in 2021, but it died in the Senate, per the Dallas Morning News.
The proposal appears to have at least partial support from far right Gov. Greg Abbott’s administration, however. In 2018, Abbott’s attorney general, Ken Paxton, issued an opinion saying that election judges with handgun licenses could carry guns at polling places as long as the site in question wasn’t a place where guns are forbidden, like government buildings or schools.
Voting rights advocates have said that Paxton’s interpretation of the law is dubious at best, and flies in the face of existing Texas law that bans firearms at polling sites. H.B. 636 would enshrine Paxton’s opinion into law.
The Brennan Center for Justice and Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence sent a letter to the House last week urging lawmakers to reject the bill, saying that it would especially drive Black and Latinx voters, whose voting rights are already disproportionately infringed upon, away from the polls. As a result, the proposal would allow Republicans to further their goal of suppressing voters, especially in blue-leaning areas.
The letter says that allowing guns in polling places would encourage “vigilantism,” as the current right-wing extremism around elections has already created alarming dangerous conditions around polling places, as in the midterm election last year when armed vigilantes intimidated voters outside of a polling place in Maricopa County, Arizona.
“False allegations of election fraud by politicians and others have dramatically raised tensions at the polls and our nation witnessed armed individuals patrolling ballot boxes in Arizona during the 2022 midterm elections,” the groups said. “Allowing non-law enforcement or licensed security to bring guns into this mix creates conditions ripe for violence.”
“This is undoubtedly a step in the wrong direction,” the letter continued. “All eligible Texans should be able to vote safely and without intimidation. H.B. 636 will undermine that promise.”
The bill’s passage came just two days before a mass shooting in Allen, Texas, in which a 33-year-old man who had posted white supremacist and neo-Nazi views online opened fire in a mall and killed eight people, and just two weeks before the first anniversary of the shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.
The Allen shooting has sparked calls for new legislation to address gun violence and rein in the prevalence of guns across the country. In recent years, gun violence has soared to new heights; 2023 is already on pace to break the all-time record for the number of mass shootings in a year in the U.S. At the same time, conservatives — often in direct response to a horrific shooting — have been loosening gun laws at a rapid pace, one that experts say is faster than ever before.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.