On July 15, a massive military exercise began in the United States. Operation Jade Helm 15 is an eight week exercise that covers six states. As explained in the New York Times, it is an exercise for “Special Operations troops in what Army planners call ‘unconventional warfare.’ The exercise is being conducted in rural Texas because the military needed ‘large areas of undeveloped land with low population densities with access to towns,’ and wanted soldiers to adapt to unfamiliar terrain as well as social and economic conditions.”
In the months leading up to the operation, right-wingers (with the help of various media personalities) became convinced there was a much more sinister plan afoot. Texas is one of three areas that have been designated “hostile territory” in the realistic role-playing scenario. The conspiracy theorists interpreted that as a plan by the government (Read: Obama) to invade Texas, take their guns and impose martial law. The plan was revealed by internet detectives who found evidence of tunnels leading to empty Walmarts and Blue Bell ice cream trucks as part of military surveillance… or something.
While the scale is much larger than most exercises, such events are not uncommon. The military has to train for all types of scenarios and do so in many areas around the country. For example, last year the Department of Defense announced they were planning for climate change. They need training to be ready for drier conditions, extreme heat or flooding and how that would affect equipment and troops. The six western states the exercise is taking place in provide the perfect conditions for these types of scenarios, making them a logical location. For the people of Texas, however, logic escaped them.
The chatter soon got so loud that military officials had to issue actual statements to assure people that this was just a test and not an invasion. In May, Texas Governor Greg Abbott realized that he had to be the governor they elected. He not only entertained the fears of invasion, he tried to allay them by saying he was ordering the Texas State Guard to monitor the military exercise to ensure that Texans’ civil and constitutional rights would not be infringed.
The day before the operation got underway Abbott’s office issued the plan details. As many as five members of the state guard will meet daily with a military liaison to review the day’s activities and plans for the next 72 hour period. There will no monitoring of actual operations in the field – because that would be ridiculous.
In his first term, Abbott has continued the tradition of recent Texas governors representing the fringe of their state. When talk of secession happened in 2009, then Governor Rick Perry said that it was a real possibility. However, Abbott has gone further and put actual thought into action – and not just with protecting Texas from possible invasion by Obama.
In May, a very popular mental health bill was passed with bipartisan support by the Texas legislature. The bill gave authority to law enforcement to apprehend a person for emergency detention and the authority of certain facilities and physicians to temporarily detain a person with mental illness that was deemed a threat or danger to others. When the bill reached the governor’s office in early June, it was expected to be signed without issue. However, that’s not exactly what happened.
A coalition of anti-psychiatry and anti-vaccine groups lobbied the governor, claiming the bill was a violation of basic rights and civil liberties. When his staffers warned him a veto coalition was “led by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a front group for the Church of Scientology” and that “their positions are well outside the mainstream,” Abbott apparently interpreted it as a reminder that these were the people he represented. He ignored the advice of medical and mental health professionals, as well as his legislature, and vetoed the bill, saying “medical staff should not be asked to engage in law enforcement, especially when that means depriving a person of the liberty protected by the Constitution.”
After all, what if a person was stockpiling guns and ammunition and they were detained for being mentally ill, when all they were doing was protecting themselves from an invasion of their state by Obama? That would be ridiculous.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.