The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to a Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, the first time the Court has agreed to hear such a case, which will likely determine the legality of similar bans that affect countless trans kids throughout the U.S.
For a case to move forward, just four Supreme Court justices out of the nine on the bench have to agree to hear a writ of certiorari argument from a petitioner. In this case, the Biden administration has decided to intervene, arguing on behalf of trans youth and their families and against the state’s ban, which is being defended by Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti.
The case, United States v. Skrmetti, was included on the Court’s order list on Monday, with no indication of which justices, if any, were opposed to hearing it before the Court. Due to the Court’s 6-3 conservative majority, the agreement to the writ means that at least one conservative bloc member of the Court, possibly more, felt compelled to hear the case.
The case will be argued in front of the Court sometime during its next term, which begins in October.
Tennessee’s law regulating gender-affirming care for transgender minors bars any physician in the state from prescribing puberty blockers or hormone therapy, and bans surgery outright — forms of treatment that are often described as life-saving for those who receive them.
In addition to the Biden administration’s appeal, trans youth and their families from Tennessee previously submitted a writ to the Supreme Court, demanding that the state law be blocked as it violates their rights to obtain health care that dozens of medical organizations and health experts say is both safe and effective. Included in that request was a statement from a then-15-year-old transgender teen, who expressed “how important this care is for tens of thousands of transgender youth” like them.
“It scares me to think about losing the medication that I need, and if this law continues, my family may have to leave Tennessee ― the place I have lived and loved my entire life,” the teen said in their statement, which was submitted last year.
The law was struck down by a federal district judge. However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled that finding in a split decision last September, with two out of three judges on the panel favoring the state’s ban.
Twenty-five states in the U.S. currently have a law or policy on the books that bans gender-affirming care for trans youth in some way. Many of these state bans are currently blocked by judicial order or are facing legal challenges. The ultimate ruling from the Supreme Court could determine whether those blocks remain in place or if it is legal for states to bar health services for trans youth.
“The future of countless transgender youth in this and future generations rests on this Court adhering to the facts, the Constitution and its own modern precedent,” said Chase Strangio, a trans rights advocate and lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
In a statement provided to Truthout, Sean Ebony Coleman, executive director of Destination Tomorrow, a national LGBTQ organization, said that “the Supreme Court’s decision to hear arguments against Tennessee’s law banning medical care for Transgender minors is a pivotal step in protecting our youth.”
“Denying gender-affirming care, which is supported by leading medical associations, is not only medically unsound but also a violation of fundamental human rights,” said Coleman, who added that the issue “is about the basic human right to live authentically and access life-saving services.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.