Skip to content Skip to footer

State Judge Overturns North Dakota’s Near-Total Ban on Abortion

Abortion rights advocates say the ruling has given them “hope” about the future of reproductive rights in the state.

On Thursday, a North Dakota district judge ruled against a near-total statewide abortion ban, finding that the law violated the constitutional rights of residents in the state.

North Dakota’s abortion ban makes the procedure illegal at all gestational stages of pregnancy. Exceptions are allowed for rape and incest, but only when a person has been pregnant for six or fewer weeks — a timeframe in which many people are not even aware they are pregnant.

The ban also stipulates that abortions can be performed when necessary to save a pregnant person’s life. However, this standard is often disregarded in practice in several states across the country, as laws are vague about what constitutes an emergency, making health care providers fear they will be punished for making a medical judgment the state disagrees with.

In North Dakota, a physician can be punished with a $10,000 fine and/or be sentenced up to five years in prison for violating the law.

Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick deemed the statute unconstitutional and in violation of people’s personal freedoms. He also blasted the law for lacking definitions that would make it clear to health care providers when an abortion could be performed.

“The North Dakota Constitution guarantees each individual, including women, the fundamental right to make medical judgments affecting his or her bodily integrity, health and autonomy, in consultation with a chosen health care provider free from government interference,” Romanick stated in his opinion, adding that “criminalizing pre-viability abortions is not necessary to promote the State’s interests.”

The law is “unconstitutionally void for vagueness,” Romanick also said. He went on:

As currently written, physicians are compelled to guess the law’s meaning and application. This lack of clarity in the law…simply cannot and does not comport with the requirements of due process.

Notably, lawyers for the state argued in favor of keeping the law during oral arguments and in their written briefs by citing a case from an entirely different state, Texas’s State v. Zurawski, which upheld the statewide abortion ban in that jurisdiction. Romanick said the citation of that ruling was wholly inappropriate to the case at hand.

“The Defendant’s heavy reliance on this case is misplaced. … The Zurawski decision, which is not binding authority on this court…[is] a different law, in a different state,” Romanick said.

The ruling removes the statewide ban on abortion, reverting to standards on abortion care that existed prior to its enactment. The state attorney general’s office plans to appeal the decision to higher courts in North Dakota.

Abortion rights advocates lauded the ruling as beneficial to residents in the state.

“This is a win for reproductive freedom and means it is now much safer to be pregnant in North Dakota. Hospitals and doctors no longer have their hands tied and can provide abortions to patients with complications,” attorney Meetra Mehdizadeh of the Center for Reproductive Rights said.

Mehdizadeh, who argued the case, recognized that more challenges were ahead, noting that the repercussions from the ban “cannot be repaired overnight.” Indeed, the only abortion clinic that had existed in the state, which was in Fargo, had moved over the statewide border to Minnesota after the ban was implemented.

The director of that location, the Red River Women’s Clinic, celebrated the ruling as well.

“We are very pleased with the decision today. It gives us hope,” clinic director Tammi Koremenaker said. “We feel like the court heard us.”

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $150,000 in one-time donations and to add 1,500 new monthly donors.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy