Federal prosecutors filed a brief on Monday in the case involving former President Donald Trump’s attempt to usurp the 2020 election results, arguing against his demands that the eventual trial be televised live.
Trump faces four indictment charges in the trial relating to his attempts to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. Several news media companies have asked Judge Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing the trial, to allow cameras in the courtroom during the trial that is scheduled to begin in March 2024.
After initially expressing no opinion, Trump’s lawyers filed a forceful legal briefing earlier this month demanding that the trial be televised, arguing that preventing Americans from watching it in real-time would “[force] the nation and the world to rely on biased, secondhand accounts coming from the Biden Administration and its media allies.” Trump has repeatedly pushed the unfounded claim that the trial is political in nature, rather than based on evidence of his wrongdoings, legal experts have pointed out.
The likelihood of Trump’s trial being televised is extremely low — a federal criminal trial has never been aired on television and doing so would violate federal court rules on procedure. Chutkan has also indicated that Trump will not be treated differently from any other defendant in her courtroom, regardless of his status as a former president and a 2024 presidential candidate.
On Monday, special counsel Jack Smith’s office filed a briefing opposed to televising the trial, noting that it would be unusual to entertain Trump’s demands and that Trump is likely motivated by a desire to bolster his presidential campaign.
Trump’s request to have the trial aired on television is “a transparent effort to demand special treatment, try his case in the courtroom of public opinion, and turn his trial into a media event,” the prosecutors said, adding that a publicly televised trial increases the odds of attempts by Trump or his allies to intimidate witnesses who have agreed to testify against him or who may decide to do so in the future.
A trial aired live would create a “carnival atmosphere,” prosecutors alleged. They also said that Trump’s demands that his trial be televised are inconsistent with his actions and filings elsewhere during the trial, writing in their brief that:
If the defendant sought sunlight as he claims, he should welcome the opportunity to put the government to its proof at trial. Instead, his response to the applications shows that he will continue to attempt to avoid answering for his criminal conduct in the courtroom while at the same time publicly grandstanding.
“The Court should decline the defendant’s ‘demand’ that he be placed beyond the rules and above the law,” the special counsel’s office concluded in its briefing. “And it should avoid the spectacle — and attendant risks of witness intimidation — that the longstanding rules against courtroom broadcasting are designed to avoid.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy