Skip to content Skip to footer

Some Hospitals Canceled Care for Trans Youth Despite Judge Blocking Trump Order

LGBTQ advocates accuse medical institutions of “obeying in advance” after Trump issued the anti-trans executive order.

Supporters of transgender youth demonstrate outside Children's Hospital Los Angeles in the wake of President Donald Trump's executive order threatening to pull federal funding from health care providers who offer gender-affirming care to children, on February 6, 2025.

Despite legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting trans rights and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, some institutions are complying with the orders — a move some advocates say is premature and potentially illegal. Hospitals have canceled gender-affirming surgeries, colleges have curtailed DEI programs, and high schools have taken anti-trans steps over fear of losing federal funding. Though many institutions haven’t complied with the orders, advocates say the ones that have are causing harm to multiple communities.

A 17-year-old high school junior on Long Island, New York, who did not want his name published due to safety concerns, told Prism that he has known he was trans since he was 12 years old. He felt an urgent need for top surgery last year and chose Northwell Health after an October 2024 consultation. He was excited about his surgery scheduled for Feb. 3.

On Jan. 28, Trump issued an executive order banning health care institutions that receive federal funding from providing gender-affirming care to those under 19. A judge has since temporarily blocked enforcement of the order, which faces a legal challenge from the American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal, and other groups on behalf of affected youth and their families.

However, the student’s surgery, just days away, was canceled.

“It just was crushing. It was so bad. I couldn’t even think straight,” he said. “It felt like my life was just falling apart. I couldn’t get anything done.”

The teen said reading the executive order sent him into a mental breakdown, and he made decisions at that moment that are still affecting his life.

“I just remember feeling so disgusted with myself reading the wording they used. I just felt so hopeless,” he said.

The New York attorney general instructed hospitals to continue gender-affirming care under state law, and Northwell reversed its decision and rescheduled the teen’s surgery, which took place on Feb. 20. He said he feels immense relief now that it’s complete, but the experience of having the appointment canceled is still on his mind. He has nightmares and fears losing access to his hormone therapy. “I do think I am traumatized,” he said.

Executive orders cannot undo laws passed by Congress or Supreme Court decisions, including existing identity-based nondiscrimination protections that conflict with the orders.

“The United States Constitution delegates the power to make laws to Congress, not the President,” said Chris Stoll, senior staff attorney with the National Center for Lesbian Rights, in an email. “When executive orders violate the law or exceed the President’s authority under the Constitution, courts have not hesitated to invalidate them.”

Protests, directives from attorneys general, and judges blocking Trump’s orders caused some, but not all, institutions to reverse course across the country. Many schools, companies, and health care providers never curtailed inclusive practices and have committed to continue them. But the fact that some institutions immediately complied — whether or not they later walked back their decision — has left some transgender patients and others affected by the orders feeling abandoned by the institutions meant to serve them.

Cameron Moore, a 19-year-old college student in New York, also had his top surgery delayed because of the order. Weill Cornell Medicine in Manhattan sent him an email on Feb. 4 that he would have to reschedule his upcoming consultation until after his 20th birthday. “Due to recent regulatory changes, we must ensure that all surgical consultations adhere to the updated age requirement of 20 years or older,” the email said. The executive order bans gender-affirming health care for those “under 19 years of age,” causing some confusion about whether 19-year-olds like Moore are included. Moore said he feels wronged by both Trump and Weill Cornell Medicine.

“They had a decision to make, and they picked the one that affected people badly,” Moore said. “The doctor’s office could have gone, ‘OK, we won’t pay attention to the executive order because it doesn’t have any effect, it’s not something you have to follow.’”

Moore, who has wanted this procedure since he was 11, now has a consultation scheduled in May with a different surgeon, after which he will need to wait for a surgery date later in the year.

Trump has issued 82 wide-reaching orders since Jan. 20 that have resulted in gender-affirming surgery delays and dozens of companies, nonprofit organizations, public media, and colleges gutting their DEI programs or removing any mention of trans services from their websites. Another order outlaws LGBTQIA+-inclusive education, while another targets trans inclusion in sports, forcing schools to choose whether to comply.

Many activists have criticized some institutions for “obeying in advance,” referencing Yale historian Timothy Snyder’s book On Tyranny, which states that “most of the power in authoritarianism is freely given.”

University of Miami student Ryan Chaffee was disturbed when the school deleted several web pages about DEI after Trump’s Jan. 20 order for the federal government to end all support of DEI. Chaffee helped organize more than 50 student organizations to launch a petition that has gathered over 1,300 signatures, asking the university to publicly acknowledge the removal of DEI resources, reinstate them, and engage openly with students about strengthening support for underrepresented groups while maintaining funding.

“When I came here for orientation, they touted the diversity and inclusion measures, and now it’s all being backtracked,” he said.

“I was kind of upset about it because I was under the impression that as a private university, we’d be safe,” Chaffee continued. “It’s just kind of scary how this can impact people.”

The criticism has turned too much to organizations’ responses to the executive orders, according to Heron Greenesmith, deputy director of policy for Transgender Law Center, when the onus should be on Trump himself.

“We want to make sure that the focus is back on the administration, who are essentially causing organizations to make these decisions, putting folks into situations where they have to make these choices,” they said.

“The intent of these orders is to persecute trans people, to undermine bodily autonomy, and to scare and threaten people into not providing programs and services for trans people, which is why community is the antidote to all of these orders,” Greenesmith continued. “They’re trying to divide us, to isolate us, to break up the community, but we’re way more powerful than they are.”

Prism is an independent and nonprofit newsroom led by journalists of color. We report from the ground up and at the intersections of injustice.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.