According to an exclusive report from the Center for American Progress (CAP), obtained by Truthout, a recently reintroduced bill in the U.S. House of Representatives could create new barriers to voter registration for transgender Americans, jeopardizing the voting rights of millions. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would require all U.S. citizens to verify their citizenship in person when registering to vote or updating their registration.
“The SAVE Act pretends to be about protecting election integrity, but in reality, it could keep millions of Americans — including trans Americans — out of the voting booth. Supporting legislation like this is supporting voter suppression,” Cait Smith, the director of LGBTQI+ policy at CAP, told Truthout.
The SAVE Act aims to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which currently allows voter registration during the driver’s license application process. If enacted, the bill would require documentary proof of citizenship, making driver’s licenses and other commonly used IDs insufficient for voter registration. This requirement would apply each time a voter updates their registration. Most people would need to present either a passport or birth certificate — documents that may not reflect the current name of transgender individuals, creating additional hurdles to voting.
The House passed the bill in 2024, but it stalled in the Senate. In January, U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) reintroduced it for the current Congress.
“Legislation such as the SAVE Act is a costly and faulty solution in search of a nonexistent problem. Numerous investigations and research findings have shown the extreme rarity of instances of election fraud,” the report states. “In reality, the SAVE Act is legislation disguised to look like it protects election integrity while actually seeking to make voting harder for millions of American citizens.”
The report highlights that many transgender people use a name different from their birth name, but not everyone can legally change it. The process varies by state and is often lengthy and complicated. Those unable to update their legal name may face discrimination or be denied services when their ID does not match the name they go by.
Under the Trump administration, obtaining a passport that reflects a transgender person’s correct name and gender has become more challenging. The State Department’s policies on updating passports for transgender applicants have been unclear, and the administration has paused applications for gender marker changes.
If the SAVE Act were to pass, many transgender people would have to rely on birth certificates to register to vote, creating further obstacles, the report says. Relying on birth certificates for voter registration would be particularly challenging for transgender voters. These documents are often difficult to update to reflect a person’s chosen name and gender. According to the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS), 44 percent of transgender adults had legally updated their name on IDs, but only 18 percent of those who use a different name had successfully changed it on their birth certificate.
Additionally, while the SAVE Act purports that a REAL ID driver’s license can be used for voter registration, the law also requires licenses to indicate voters’ citizenship status — something not mandated by the REAL ID Act of 2005. “[N]early all Americans would not be able to use a REAL ID to register to vote under the SAVE Act,” the report states.
The 2015 USTS found that just 11 percent of transgender respondents had identification documents that fully matched their name and gender marker on all of their identification documents. With the ongoing uncertainty around passport name change policies, this issue could become more widespread. If the SAVE Act passes, as many as 3 million voters may lack the necessary documentation to register, the report states.
“The SAVE Act is a trick by politicians that threatens to disenfranchise millions of eligible American citizens. It would particularly make it difficult to vote for Americans who have changed their name, including trans Americans and married women,” Greta Bedekovics, the associate director of democracy policy at CAP, told Truthout.
Voting rights experts also warn that the SAVE Act could create obstacles for married women who have changed their last names. While the bill does not directly prohibit these women from voting, it could introduce additional hurdles in the voter registration process. A 2006 Brennan Center survey found that 34 percent of women do not have proof of citizenship that reflects their current legal name.
Experts also note that the high cost of obtaining passports and other documentation could lead to voter suppression. In fact, only one in five Americans with a household income below $50,000 have a valid passport. “The policies in the SAVE Act are a serious socioeconomic issue that would disproportionately impact the voting rights of working-class and lower-income Americans,” CAP explains in a separate report on the SAVE Act.
In fact, in response to a concerned community member who asked what would happen if people couldn’t afford a “$200 passport,” U.S. Representative Tim Walberg (R-Michigan) replied, “Well, then they shouldn’t be voting.”
Voting rights advocates have also contended that the SAVE Act would make voting more difficult for senior citizens, college students and tribal citizens, as military and tribal IDs do not meet the bill’s requirements.
“[W]hether by incompetence or intent, the legislation would be a disaster for Americans. Congress cannot allow this bill to pass,” Bedekovics told Truthout.
The CAP report cites Kansas and Arizona, where similar laws have been enacted, as examples of how such legislation can “make voting harder.” “We don’t have to wonder how this would play out; Kansas and Arizona have shown how eligible Americans would be blocked from the ballot box,” Bedekovics told Truthout.
In Kansas, while the law was in effect, 31,000 eligible citizens were unable to register — 12 percent of whom were first-time voters. In Arizona, just weeks before the 2024 general election, nearly 100,000 voters were at risk due to administrative errors related to the state’s noncitizen voting requirement, and another 40,000 faced potential disenfranchisement for lacking the required documentation. These voter suppression laws may have had a disproportionate impact on transgender voters.
“Congress must resist harmful proposed policies such as those in the SAVE Act in order to ensure that all Americans, including transgender Americans, are able to exercise their right to vote. Should this legislation pass, it would only serve to further discrimination against transgender people and could keep millions of voters out of the voting booth,” the report concludes.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 4 days to add 310 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.