Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Senate Rejects Resolution to Repeal EPA’s Air Pollution Standards

The Senate voted 46-53 on Wednesday to reject a resolution to repeal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards aimed at reducing the amount of toxic pollution emitted from coal burning power plants.

The Senate voted 46-53 on Wednesday to reject a resolution to repeal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards aimed at reducing the amount of toxic pollution emitted from coal burning power plants.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) gathered 29 other senators to sponsor the failed resolution to repeal the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) under the Congressional Review Act. Had the repeal been successful, the EPA may have been forbidden from introducing similar pollution limits in the future, according to the White House, which threatened to veto the resolution.

Inhofe has said the Obama administration has a “radical green agenda” and is waging a “war on coal” with expensive regulations that may force some older power plants to shut down and lay off workers.

The EPA, however, says MATS will create thousands of jobs and prevent even more heart attacks, child asthma cases and premature deaths each year.

“Despite fear mongering by the coal industry, some utilities and their allies, the Senate has rejected an irresponsible effort to repeal mercury and air toxics protections that are backed by science and required by law,” said John Walke, clean air director at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The House Republican leadership should take note and cease its efforts to undermine the Clean Air Act; efforts the public does not support.”

MATS will require many of the nation’s coal burning power plants to update or install pollution controls such as smoke stack scrubbers to reduce the amount of air pollution emitted into the air when coal is burned to create electricity. The rules will also level the playing field for power plants that are already using such technology.

MATS are the first federal standards for coal burning power plants to be put in place since major Clean Air Act amendments were passed in 1990. The rules were tied up in legal battles for years as the coal and utilities industries resisted federal efforts to regulate toxic air pollution.

The EPA estimates that, once implemented, the MATS standards will prevent 130,000 child asthma cases, 11,000 premature deaths and 4,700 heart attacks annually. The agency also estimates the pollution control technology updates at power plants will create 46,000 short-term construction jobs and 8,000 long-term utility jobs.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy