Scott Walker’s attacks on unions and family paying jobs in Wisconsin helped elevate his national profile and ingratiated him with deep-pocketed political donors like the Kochs. Can he take this agenda nationwide?
This weekend’s New York Times Magazine has a cover story by Wisconsin native Dan Kaufman called “Scott Walker and the Fate of the Union” that digs deep into Walker’s anti-worker crusade. The piece touches on the struggle over Act 10, which lowered wages and took away the bargaining rights of 320,000 public-sector workers in 2011, and follows the story of ironworker Randy Bryce, who came to the Wisconsin capitol in 2015 to protest the “right to work” bill that would have a similar impact on 180,000 private-sector workers. Study after study has documented that misnamed “right to work” laws are associated with significantly lower wages for workers and undermine their skills and safety training. Walker promises more of the same in Wisconsin as the repeal of prevailing wage is being considered in the state legislature.
The New York Times report cites work by the Center for Media and Democracy (publishers of PRwatch.org) which shows that the Wisconsin bill was virtually a word for word copy of the American Legislative Exchange Council model as are other bills being introduced across the United States.
“Many union leaders worry that if Walker is elected president, Congress could pass a national right-to-work bill,” Kaufman writes. “In this sense, passing Act 10 was a kind of audition for Walker.”
“If we can do it in Wisconsin, we can do it anywhere — even in our nation’s capital,” [Walker] wrote in his 2013 book, “Unintimidated.” The origins of Wisconsin’s right-to-work bill, meanwhile, showed whom he might have been trying to impress.
As revealed by the Center for Media and Democracy, a watchdog organization based in Madison, Wisconsin’s law was a virtual copy of a 1995 model bill promoted by the American Legislative Exchange Council, an organization based in Arlington, Va., that disseminates model legislation for a consortium of corporations and conservative private backers, including the Koch brothers.
A law with language that closely tracks that model bill was enacted in Michigan in 2012. Similarly worded proposals were introduced this year in Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico and West Virginia, but they failed to advance. Missouri’s right-to-work bill, which was also more or less identical to the model bill, passed both houses this year, only to be vetoed by Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat, early this month.
A few weeks after signing the right-to-work bill, Walker gave a private talk in New York to a group of powerful Republican donors that included David Koch. Koch later told reporters that he believes that Walker will be the eventual Republican presidential nominee. “I thought he had a great message,” Koch said after the meeting to a reporter for The New York Observer. “Scott Walker is a tremendous candidate.”
CMD has been highlighting the influence of the Koch-backed American Legislative Exchange Council since launching ALECexposed.org in July 2011, after a whistleblower brought CMD over 800 of ALEC’s previously-secret model bills. These cookie cutter bills are once again spreading across the country along with efforts to ban local governments from raising the wage and implementing paid sick days.
Check out the similarities between the ALEC Right to Work Act and the right-to-work bills introduced this year:
Wisconsin’s Failing Economy
The impact of Walker’s ALEC-inspired agenda has been less than rosy.
“If Wisconsin is a model for what Walker might achieve nationally, it is worth examining his results so far,” Kaufman writes.
Walker credits Act 10 in part for the decline in Wisconsin’s unemployment rate since he took office in 2011 and has said he considers right-to-work “one more arrow in that quiver” for the creation of jobs. But since 2011, the state has fallen to 40th out of the 50 states in job growth and 42nd in wage growth, according to an analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data conducted by The Capital Times of Wisconsin.
Act 10, officially called the Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill, was supposed to fix persistent budget shortfalls by lowering labor costs and eliminating union rules. But Wisconsin’s two-year projected budget deficit has actually increased; in May, the Legislature approved a $250 million cut to the state’s prized university system to help close the gap. Wisconsin is now among the top 10 states people move out of.
“Wisconsin has become a kind of laboratory for oligarchs to implement their political and economic agenda,” electrician’s union Local 2304 president Dave Poklinkoski told Kaufman. “We’re small enough that they can carry it out. Can they carry it out on the national level? We’ll find out.”
More Broken Promises from Walker
Walker’s trail of broken promises includes his 2010 pledge to create 250,000 jobs. He failed to reach that mark by 57 percent. Although Walker now boasts about right to work as he campaigns for the Republican presidential nomination, he told Wisconsin voters during the 2012 and 2014 elections that the bill wouldn’t get to his desk. One Walker supporter says the Governor looked him in the eye and pledged not to bring the bill to a vote.
Terry McGowan, the president of Local 139, a statewide union of 9,000 heavy-machinery operators, endorsed Walker [in 2010], because he had promised to increase highway funding and build more roads. McGowan supported him again last year, but since then, he has come to reconsider . . .
“I sort of trusted the guy,” he said, recalling his 2010 endorsement of Walker. “I took some bullets at the time from the other unions.” When Walker’s “divide and conquer” video was released in 2012, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel asked McGowan about the governor’s remarks. McGowan told the paper that the phrase “divide and conquer” troubled him. “It means turning worker against worker,” he said.
Last fall, McGowan met with Walker, who was seeking a contribution and another endorsement for governor, at a small campaign office in Wauwatosa, outside Milwaukee. “I looked across the table at him, and I said, ‘We are both God-fearing men,’ ” McGowan told me. “ ’If you can tell me that right-to-work will not come on your desk, then I will take you for your word.'”
“He looked me in the eyes, and he said, ‘It will not make it to my desk.’ He was looking for a contribution, and I was looking for a commitment. We both got what we came for. He kept his, and I lost mine.”
Read the full New York Times Magazine article here. For more on Scott Walker’s history with ALEC, click here.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.