Skip to content Skip to footer

Sanders Says Bipartisanship Can Step Aside for COVID Relief for Families

Senate Republicans have proposed a majorly trimmed down version of Biden’s coronavirus stimulus package.

Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks during a confirmation hearing before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on Capitol Hill, January 27, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

In response to a new, trimmed down COVID-19 stimulus proposal by Republicans, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) said that passing a substantial relief bill takes precedence over bipartisanship on the bill.

“The issue is not bipartisanship or not. The issue is, are we going to address the incredible set of crises and the pain and the anxiety which is in this country?” Sanders told ABC’s Martha Raddatz on Sunday. “If Republicans want to work with us, they have better ideas on how to address those crises, that’s great. But to be honest with you, I have not yet heard that.”

Highlighting food insecurity, the pandemic and the looming eviction crisis, Sanders said that, “we all want bipartisanship and I think you’re gonna see more of it as we move down the pike,” but that urgently needed relief takes precedence.

Republicans’ latest stimulus proposal offers dramatically less relief. On Sunday morning, 10 GOP senators released a shrunken version of President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 stimulus proposal, the latter of which many Democrats have rallied behind. The Republican proposal cuts the minimum wage raise and reduces the size and eligibility of the direct relief checks.

The senators, led by Susan Collins (R-Maine), sent Biden a letter asking for “bipartisanship and unity” on the stimulus. In their $600 billion proposal — less than a third of Biden’s — they nix the $15 minimum wage increase, cut the relief checks to $1,000 down from $1,400, and reduce the salary eligibility for the checks down from the Democrats’ proposal of $75,000 to $50,000 for individuals and from $150,000 to $100,000 for couples.

Republicans argue that reducing eligibility is more beneficial to the economy. “Our money goes to that income level where we know it will stimulate the economy,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), one of the letter’s signatories.

Critics have pointed out that the GOP’s argument isn’t sound. “If the argument is that the relief is better targeted, then why reduce that relief?” writes The Washington Post’s James Downie. “The only reason to offer less is that Republicans think struggling Americans need less.” Economists have said that Biden’s plan would significantly stimulate the economy.

The GOP’s proposal also offers less unemployment relief. Biden’s bill provides $400 through September; the Republicans propose cutting it down to $300 through June. The Post reports that the group plans to meet with Biden on Monday to discuss bipartisanship on the stimulus.

Congress has squabbled over eligibility requirements for the checks in recent months. Biden has signaled openness to raising the salary cap, but Republicans have opposed the checks entirely, saying that they’re going to people who don’t need them. Lowering the cap from $75,000 to $50,000 cuts out a large swath of the middle class — in some places like California and New York, $50,000 is considered low income.

Moderate Democrats like Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) also stood with Republican colleagues in opposition to $2,000 checks. However, as Sanders pointed out, the party won the Senate partially because the new Democratic senators from Georgia ran in support of more generous direct payments. Most Democrats have stood behind Biden’s stimulus proposal.

Regardless of bipartisanship, Democrats can use budget reconciliation to pass the stimulus with their congressional majority. Both Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have indicated support for this procedure, saying that it’s fine if Republicans want to work with Democrats, but that the priority is to pass the stimulus, and to do it fast.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy