With just four days to go before the New Hampshire Democratic primary, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Friday sought to contrast his small dollar-fueled campaign with Pete Buttigieg’s reliance on big money by highlighting the former South Bend, Indiana mayor’s dozens of billionaire campaign contributors.
At a breakfast event at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire hours ahead of the sixth Democratic presidential debate Friday night, Sanders—who has rejected all billionaire campaign cash—rattled off the headlines of several recent news stories on Buttigieg’s billionaire donors.
“I’m reading some headlines from newspapers about Pete Buttigieg: ‘Pete Buttigieg Has Most Exclusive Billionaire Donors of Any Democrat.’ That was from Forbes,” Sanders said. “The Hill: ‘Pete Buttigieg Tops Billionaire Donor List.’ Fortune: ‘Pete Buttigieg Takes Lead as Big Business Candidate in 2020 Field’.”
“I like Pete Buttigieg, nice guy, but we are in a moment where billionaires control not only our economy but our political process,” said the Vermont senator. “Do you think if you’re collecting money from dozens of dozens of billionaires you’re going to stand up to the drug companies and you’re going to throw their CEOs in jail if they’re acting criminally?”
Sen. Bernie Sanders: "I'm reading some headlines from newspapers about Pete Buttigieg. 'Pete Buttigieg Has Most Exclusive Billionaire Donors Of Any Democrat.'" pic.twitter.com/ptcAgr87sz
— The Hill (@thehill) February 7, 2020
According to the December Forbes analysis Sanders cited, Buttigieg had received donations from forty billionaires and their spouses as of September 30th of last year.
Thirteen of those billionaires gave exclusively to Buttigieg, “by far the most of any Democrat running for president,” Forbes found.
Sanders’ presidential campaign, by contrast, has relied mostly on small donations averaging around $18. As Common Dreams reported Thursday, Sanders raised $25 million in January alone from over 1.3 million donations averaging $18.72.
Using the hashtag #PetesBillionaires, Sanders tweeted following the St. Anselm College event that “this election is fundamentally about whose side you are on.”
This election is fundamentally about whose side you are on. #PetesBillionaires pic.twitter.com/hZi3uzCmvJ
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) February 7, 2020
Members of Sanders’ presidential campaign also chimed in:
#PetesBillionaires oppose #MedicareForAll
#PetesBillionaires oppose the #GreenNewDeal #PetesBillionaires don't want to #CancelStudentDebt
You can be on the side of the billionaire class or you can be on the side of the working class, but you can't be on the side of both. https://t.co/PPrlM0CFsa
— Warren Gunnels (@GunnelsWarren) February 7, 2020
The primary election is coming down to a choice between #NotMeUs and #PetesBillionaires.
Which side are you on? pic.twitter.com/c8N6E6P0OK
— David Sirota (@davidsirota) February 7, 2020
The Sanders campaign’s effort to put Buttigieg’s billionaire campaign contributors in the spotlight comes amid tightening poll numbers in New Hampshire. A Boston Globe/WBZ-TV/Suffolk University survey released Thursday showed Sanders leading Buttigieg by just one percentage point in the state—24% to 23%. The Emerson pre-primary tracking poll, meanwhile, still showed Sanders up in the Granite State, with the Vermont senator leading the former mayor by 9 points (32% to 23%).
In the wake of the Iowa debacle and with the New Hampshire primary just days away, Current Affairs columnist and Sanders supporter Paul Waters-Smith emphasized Friday that the senator’s candidacy represents an “excellent opportunity to deepen a vision of a truly democratic society where working people own and control the economy and politics, all the while mobilizing behind an agenda which addresses our burning immediate needs.”
We need to realize just how historic and unprecedented the Bernie movement is. It's a chance to do something that people said could never be done. My colleague Paul Waters-Smith explains why it's so important that we win:https://t.co/OpvKy1LPDt
— Nathan J Robinson (@NathanJRobinson) February 7, 2020
“This election will affect the lives of millions who can’t even vote or donate to the campaign,” wrote Waters-Smith. “Given the stakes, we can afford to put our cynicism and dispassion aside. We can’t let the nay-sayers, the dirty tricks, the smears, or the fear of failure hold us back from doing our part. We are on the brink of achieving something historic, and we can’t let them stop us.”
Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.
Truthout is widely read among people with lower incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.
We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.
We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?