Skip to content Skip to footer

Sabotaging Montana’s Campaign Finance Legacy

The Supreme Court has trumped a century-old state law that made the state a model for campaign finance in America.

As a Montana newspaper editorial succinctly put it: “The greatest living issue confronting us today is whether the corporations shall control the people or the people shall control the corporations.”

That might sound like it was written in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. But it was actually in 1906, back when Montanans were rising up against out-of-state mining corporations known as the “copper kings.” Those corporate powers were exploiting Montana’s workforce, extracting its public resources, and routinely extending bribes to control its government.

In 1912, however, the people passed the Corrupt Practices Act, a citizens’ initiative that outlawed direct corporate expenditures in elections for state office.

The law broke the copper kings’ legislative chokehold, and a century later, it was still working to put people power over money politics. Even today, the average cost of state senate races in Montana stands at only $17,000. This low cost enables candidates to spend more time talking to everyday folks, and it contributes to one of America’s highest voter-turnout rates.

Doesn’t that sound like a model of democracy in action? Well, it was, until an out-of-state corporate front group rode in like copper kings to sue the state. With a pack of high-dollar lawyers and a bundle of corporate funding, the group wailed that Montana’s anti-corruption law discriminates against poor corporations, denying them their First Amendment “right” to have the biggest voice in government that money can buy.

And now, the five corporate hacks controlling the Supreme Court have ratified the front group’s ridiculous argument, imperiously shoving Montana’s law into the ditch and re-imposing the rule of special interest money over the people’s will.

To stop this court’s coup against our democracy, we the People must pass a constitutional amendment overturning these decisions. To help, go to:

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?