On Monday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that El Salvador’s president has agreed to accept people of any nationality who are deported from the U.S — a proposal that experts have said would likely violate international laws regarding the rights of migrants.
El Salvador President Nayib Bukele also agreed to allow the U.S. to deport incarcerated people to El Salvador, even if they are U.S. citizens, Rubio said during a state visit to the country.
Rubio, who was meeting with Bukele to sign an unrelated nuclear agreement, called the deal “the most unprecedented, extraordinary, extraordinary migratory agreement anywhere in the world.” He said that the deal would allow the U.S. to deport to El Salvador “dangerous criminals currently in custody and serving their sentence in the United States even though they’re U.S. citizens or legal residents.”
The Trump administration indicated that it has no plans to deport U.S. citizens who are currently incarcerated, but celebrated the deal nonetheless.
Bukele confirmed the deal on his X account, writing that the agreement included the U.S. paying a “relatively low” fee to transport immigrants and citizens to the country.
Legal and civil rights experts decried the plan, noting that it wouldn’t stand up to legal scrutiny.
“The US is absolutely prohibited from deporting U.S. citizens, whether they are incarcerated or not,” University of California-Berkeley law professor Leti Volpp told CNN.
Emerson College international politics professor Mneesha Gellman agreed, calling the proposal “bizarre and unprecedented,” and saying that the deal was “being made potentially between two authoritarian, populist, right-wing leaders seeking a transactional relationship.”
“It’s not rooted in any sort of legal provision and likely violates a number of international laws relating to the rights of migrants,” Gellman added.
The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) president Roman Palomares also panned the proposal, saying that the organization “opposes treating deported non-criminal migrants like cattle who can be shuttled from one country to another without regard to their home of origin.”
Bukele’s government has been internationally condemned for its authoritarianism and glaring violations of human rights. Amnesty International has warned of the “gradual replacement of gang violence with state violence” under Bukele’s presidency, for example.
The U.S. State Department has also recognized that El Salvador has seen a number of civil rights diminish under Bukele’s tenure, including rights for incarcerated people, writing on its website in 2022 that:
Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings, forced disappearances; torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by security forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; serious restrictions on free expression and media, including censorship and threats to enforce criminal laws to limit expression; serious government corruption; lack of investigation and accountability for gender-based violence; significant barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health services; and crimes involving violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex individuals.
The agreement between El Salvador and the U.S. comes as President Donald Trump has enacted a series of inhumane immigration standards since taking office, leading to widespread racial profiling and a multitude of cases in which U.S. citizens have been detained without probable cause.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.