Bravo to the The New York Times for publishing Adam Hochschild’s January 17 op-ed, An Assassination’s Long Shadow. The piece marked the 50th anniversary of an event long forgotten in the United States: the U.S.-sponsored removal and murder of a democratically elected leader in Africa. Three days after the murder, our own democratically elected leader—one who would meet a similar fate—was sworn in as the 35th President of the United States.
Hochschild’s article concerns the 1961 assassination of Patrice Lumumba, the first prime minister elected in a country newly independent of Belgian rule, which is now known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The opinion piece runs two pages online, and concerns a tragic event that took place half a century ago, on a continent that rarely makes headlines in this country, and it reveals dark and shameful truths about U.S. foreign policy—hardly the sort of story that sells newspapers.
The Times deserves credit not only for granting a story with little popular appeal a coveted position on its op-ed page, but also for allowing the author to make the case that the violence and human suffering that grips the region today resulted in part from the U.S. betrayal of Lumumba fifty years ago.
A Valued Friend with Blood on His Hands
Moreover, the author demonstrates that the assassination, which the C.I.A actively supported “with White House approval,” made way for the “disastrous, 32-year dictatorship” of one of Lumumba’s captors, Joseph Mobutu. Among the “succession of presidents” who would welcome Mobutu as an ally, Hochschild singles out George H.W. Bush for publicly referring to Mobutu as “one of our most valued friends.”
This arguably avoidable reference to the living patriarch of one of the most powerful political families in America is both striking and heartening. Might the Times at last be willing to challenge the elder Bush concerning a far more explosive subject: the assassination of John F. Kennedy less than three years after Lumumba’s death, in Bush’s home state?
George H.W. Bush: Out of the Loop and into the Twilight Zone
In my book, Family of Secrets, I cite evidence that the elder Bush was deeply involved in C.I.A covert operations during the time in which both assassinations took place. I document his close ties to mining interests comparable to the ones Lumumba himself had angered—by declaring, as Hochschild recounts, that it was not enough for the Congolese to gain political independence from colonial rule, but that “Africans had to also benefit from the great wealth in their soil.”
More troubling are the many inconsistencies and gaps that I discovered in accounts by Bush and others concerning his activities on and around the day of the assassination, all of which are extensively documented and footnoted. These include:
- Bush’s noted inability to recall where he was on November 22, 1963;
- his longtime friendship with George de Mohrenschildt, a mentor and confidant to Lee Harvey Oswald;
- a declassified FBI memo identifying Bush as a C.I.A officer working with Cuban exiles at the time of the assassination;
- FBI records documenting a call Bush himself placed to the Bureau on Nov. 22 from a location near Dallas, offering to identify a possible triggerman in the assassination—a man Bush knew far better than he revealed at the time, and who he knew could not have been the triggerman
- Barbara Bush’s revelation in her 1994 book, Barbara Bush: A Memoir, that the Bushes were having lunch the week of November 22 with Alfred Ulmer, an old friend who, research shows, was one of the C.I.A.’s experts in deposing leaders.
- Bush’s close relationship with the military intelligence official whose unit and unit members played an astonishing array of roles on November 22, from forcing their way into the lead car of Kennedy’s motorcade to providing the interpreter who framed Marina Oswald’s statements in a way that implicated her husband.
Wondering why you haven’t heard of any of this before? Ask your favorite news media organization.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.