Jackson, Mississippi, residents will now have a formal seat in negotiations that could determine the future of clean water access.
The change comes from a “motion to intervene” in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) case against the city of Jackson. Filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of the Mississippi Poor People’s Campaign and the People’s Advocacy Institute, it marks the first time in decades that Jackson residents will have a voice in the rehabilitation of the water infrastructure.
“This is a very significant win for us,” said Danyelle Holmes, an organizer with the Mississippi Poor People’s Campaign and a resident of Jackson. “This is what we have been long fighting for — a voice at the table and being able to be a part of the governance process as it relates to the water and sewer infrastructure here in the city of Jackson.”
For years, the water infrastructure in the capital city of 150,000 residents has failed against extreme weather, such as flooding and freezing temperatures. Worsening climate events are emerging pressures on the water system. Still, advocates say the reasons Jacksonians lack access to reliable, safe water are reflective of a deeper pattern of anti-Black city planning, sub-par infrastructure funding, and a failed promise from the federal government to invest in “environmental justice” communities.
“Residents have been left in the dark when it comes to public health,” said Jessica Vosburgh, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. Intervenor status might change that.
On March 18, a federal judge granted the intervention, a legal move that allows third parties to take part in discussions even if they’re not listed as plaintiffs or defendants in a case. In late 2022, the EPA sued the city of Jackson for violating the Safe Drinking Water Act, which removed management of the water system from the city and placed control in the hands of a court-appointed manager, Ted Henifin.
Advocates say that placing control of the system in a court-appointed manager was more about the financial stabilization of the system than addressing near-daily public health concerns about sewage leakage, frequent boil water advisories, and exposure to lead. More than a year after the EPA filed the case against the city, residents still felt that adequate communication was lacking about health risks and transparency around fixing the water system.
The formal intervention will ideally allow residents to enjoy a level of participation and transparency of information that has never been offered before.
“The aim is to disseminate information not to just the community but to provide information to the court,” said Mikaila Hernández, a Bertha Justice Fellow at the Center for Constitutional Rights.
Before this point, conversations about the future of Jackson’s water took place between federal agencies like the Department of Justice and EPA along with state representatives — excluding Jackson residents, who know firsthand what it means to purchase bottled water to fulfill everyday tasks like cooking and cleaning.
It was a dynamic that mirrored too closely how the challenges with the water infrastructure came to be in the first place. Many components of Jackson’s water system were first built in the mid-20th century and haven’t been updated or replaced. Funding needed to address regular water main breaks and treatment plant compliance issues lagged as white flight lowered municipal tax revenue and the city’s ability to fund infrastructure projects. Jackson’s white population dropped by nearly 35,000 people between 1990 and 2000, while the Black population continued to increase.
The delay suggests that the state deliberately prevents these funds from reaching Jackson residents, Hernández said. From rejecting loan and emergency funding requests for aging infrastructure to denying a city proposal that would have put in place a 1% sales tax increase to fund water system repairs and even blocking pandemic aid and federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding from reaching the city of Jackson—white state leaders have prevented the Black-led city from making necessary changes.
Under the Biden administration’s goals to prioritize funding for “environmental justice” communities through his Justice40 agenda, Jackson, a majority-Black city where the average household income is $39,000, should be the prime recipient of federal funding. However, the reality differs from the promise.
Some attention from the White House has resulted in funding infusions of nearly $600 million, though the Jackson mayor previously said that the system requires $2 billion in upgrades and construction work.
But now, with a court-approved seat at the table, legal advocates hope that residents can advocate for their own needs, such as information about water testing and results along with debt and bill payment forgiveness. Holmes said the work is just beginning, and rectifying the damage will take years.
Vosburgh said she hopes the discussions will compel the state to take responsibility for the harm it has done to the city.
Prism is an independent and nonprofit newsroom led by journalists of color. We report from the ground up and at the intersections of injustice.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy