Former President Donald Trump directly pressured former Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) weeks after he lost the 2020 presidential race in the state to now-President Joe Biden, according to new reporting from The Washington Post.
It was previously known that Trump had contacted Ducey, as the former governor had said at the time that then-President Trump called him to discuss the election results. But the extent to which Trump sought to have Ducey change the election wasn’t known prior to this weekend.
The Post spoke to three sources with knowledge of the call from Trump to Ducey. According to one prominent GOP donor who spoke directly to Ducey about the matter, Trump’s conversation with Ducey felt like “pressure” from the president to take improper actions that would overturn the election results in the state.
Trump urged Ducey to uncover fraudulent Biden votes in order to help him overcome Biden’s election win, according to The Post’s reporting.
Several audits and post-election checks by state and county officials in Arizona have confirmed that there was no widespread fraud in the statewide election, despite Trump’s repeated claims suggesting otherwise.
The conversation between Trump and Ducey echoed a phone call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, in which Trump sought to compel the Republican elections official to “find” him nearly 12,000 additional votes to overturn the presidential election results in that state, which Biden also won. Unlike Ducey’s conversation with Trump, however, that conversation was recorded, and has since been made publicly available.
Trump also tried to enlist his vice president, Mike Pence, to call Ducey in order to compel him to overturn the race. Pence did call Ducey several times, but didn’t appear to put the pressure on him to change the election results that Trump did.
Ducey also recounted to the GOP donor he spoke with that it surprised him that special counsel Jack Smith, who is leading a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, hadn’t yet contacted him about his conversation with the former president. It’s unclear whether Smith or his office has contacted Ducey since the conversation between him and the donor, which took place earlier this year.
While an ongoing investigation in Georgia could result in Trump being handed state felony charges, Trump’s actions in the state could also run afoul of federal laws. According to 52 U.S. Code 20511, a crime is committed if a person “knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process” through unjustified alteration of the tabulation of ballots.
Political and legal observers noted that Ducey’s recents comments about Trump pressuring him to overturn the 2020 race were likely to be noticed by Smith and the DOJ.
“It seems likely that the special counsel’s office saw the Post’s front-page, above-the-fold article,” said MSNBC producer Steve Benen.
Ducey’s statements — and possible cooperation with the DOJ in the future — might encourage other governors or state elections officials to speak up, especially in light of recent charges Trump has already received from the department over his improper handling of government documents and his impending charges from Smith regarding his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
“Once prosecutions start, witnesses tend to develop confidence in coming forward,” said Joyce Vance, a former federal prosecutor and a current law professor at the University of Alabama. “More chickens coming home to roost.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.