Skip to content Skip to footer

Report: Credit Scores Are Lower in the South, and Medical Debt Could Be to Blame

A new analysis finds a link between areas with low average credit scores and high amounts of medical debt.

Credit scores are far lower on average in the South than they are in northern parts of the contiguous U.S. — and medical debt and state lawmakers’ refusal to expand Medicaid could be to blame, a new analysis by the Washington Post has revealed.

The analysis found a gap of roughly 100 points between the lowest average credit scores in the North and South, with the lowest seen most commonly in parts of the Deep South, and the highest typically found in northern states like Minnesota, Wisconsin and New Hampshire.

One of the largest factors at play is medical debt, Post researchers found. Medical debt is the most common type of debt reported in credit reports, and the South has the highest amount of medical debt in the country; according to the Urban Institute, 92 of the top 100 counties with the highest share of people struggling with medical debt, with the other eight in the adjacent states of Missouri and Oklahoma.

The decision by most Southern states not to use additional funding from the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid is a major contributing factor to the increased amount of medical debt, the report found, as those states have the highest levels of medical debt and lowest credit scores.

11 states — including North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Texas and Florida — have chosen not to expand Medicaid through the ACA.

Medicaid expansion had a huge impact on medical debt across the country; between 2013 and 2020, of the states that opted in, medical debt was cut by nearly half. It also buoyed the general financial health of people who had struggled with medical debt, as the Washington Post pointed out, with people enrolled under the Medicaid expansion seeing their overall debt in collections fall after the program was rolled out.

“Expanding Medicaid could help a lot, but these states just don’t do it,” Urban Institute economist and credit score researcher Breno Braga, told The Washington Post. “And they don’t realize how much of an impact that actually has on people’s lives and their financial well-being — even access to employment. If you have a bad credit history, employers might deny you work, you know?”

Indeed, low credit scores can have devastating impact on the working class’s financial and overall wellbeing — and systemic suppression of credit scores, as the government has used against Black communities, can exacerbate these impacts.

A low credit score reduces the chance of receiving loans for purchasing a house or a car, getting low interest rates for any loan, and having benefits associated with certain credit cards, such as cash back rewards.

The systemic lowering of credit scores for Black Americans and low-wage workers have led to calls for the credit score system to be majorly reformed, if not abolished entirely. The modern credit score system has only existed for less than 35 years, and critics say that credit scores are often used simply to further oppress people who are already disadvantaged in the U.S.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.