Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.
An argument at the very center of Republican attorney generals’ Supreme Court case against President Joe Biden’s student debt cancellation analysis is based on a “fundamentally false” assertion, according to a new and apparent first-of-its-kind analysis released this week.
The central theory of standing for Biden v. Nebraska — the case brought by six Republican state attorneys general, including Missouri’s, to strike down Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan — relies on the unproven claim that Missouri’s student loan servicer MOHELA would not be able to pay its share into state treasury (something it hasn’t done for 15 years) if the plan took effect. The argument, which a majority of the Supreme Court appears to favor, boils down to a claim that MOHELA’s finances would be negatively impacted.
But a new bombshell report by the Debt Collective and the Roosevelt Institute finds that MOHELA wouldn’t be financially harmed by student debt relief — and that its revenue would actually soar to record heights as a result of cancellation.
Using internal MOHELA figures from August uncovered by a Freedom of Information Act request by the groups, the analysis finds that MOHELA would make $97 million a year after cancellation, a 9 percent increase over its 2022 revenues. This estimate is conservative, as it is based on MOHELA’s assumption that everyone who is eligible will apply for full cancellation under the plan, which is unlikely.
The revenue boost is attributable to the fact that MOHELA has more than tripled the amount of accounts it services over the past few years as the student loan payment pause has been in place.
Even further, the report estimates that, with a conservative estimate based on the $11.49 per account that MOHELA is paid to process a discharge — which will likely be more under the Biden administration plan — the servicer would experience a windfall totalling tens of millions of dollars as a direct result of cancellation. The report authors conservatively estimate that MOHELA would make $167 million in the first year after cancellation — an 88 percent increase from its 2022 revenue.
If true, the report’s findings eliminate standing — or the basis for one’s ability to argue a case in front of a court — for the Republican officials’ claims against student debt relief. Though much of the debates around the case have centered on whether or not the Biden administration has the authority to cancel student debt, the report essentially lays out evidence that Supreme Court justices should not have taken up the case to begin with; the report authors wrote that their report suggests the case for standing “is even weaker than previously considered, if not completely baseless.”
Even if the findings by the Roosevelt Institute and Debt Collective weren’t entirely accurate — and there are no similar calculations to rebut them — experts say that it is absurd that the Supreme Court would have taken up the case without any proof of standing from the plaintiffs.
“Missouri based much of its argument for standing on the claim that MOHELA would *necessarily* pass along any economic harm from the debt relief program to the state. Even an unrelated windfall substantially reduces the likelihood of that pass-through occurring,” legal expert Steve Vladeck wrote on Twitter on Tuesday in response to the report.
“But what this all really drives home to me is how ridiculous it is that SCOTUS may reach the merits of this major federal program when the factual predicates on which Missouri’s (dubious) standing arguments rest have not been *remotely* developed by any federal court,” Vladeck continued.
The report also uncovers a number of other questionable circumstances surrounding the case. Though perhaps not a direct financial benefit, the report authors note that the discharge of many of the servicers’ newly acquired accounts would be a huge legal boon, as MOHELA has already been found to be mismanaging Public Service Loan Forgiveness accounts that recently came under its care.
Further, as highlighted by The American Prospect, MOHELA is essentially contractually barred from suing the Education Department’s Office of Federal Student Aid over student debt forgiveness — perhaps explaining why the servicer has distanced itself from the case.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.