Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) has condemned Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts for declining an invitation from the Senate to testify in an upcoming hearing regarding the ethics of the Supreme Court, as spurred by recent revelations of corruption among justices.
On Tuesday, Roberts sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) saying that he “must respectfully decline” the invitation to testify before the committee next week. He wrote that it is “exceedingly rare” for a chief justice to appear before Congress — though some lawmakers have pointed out that the circumstances necessitating his appearance are also extreme, and warrant an equally extreme response.
Ocasio-Cortez said on Tuesday that Roberts bears responsibility for the current corruption on the High Court, and denounced his decision not to appear in the Senate.
“Under Roberts, the Supreme Court has unraveled constitutional rights and seen several justices engage in corrupt financial arrangements. Now he is refusing to answer questions,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter.
“How does Roberts expect SCOTUS to maintain authority if they reject accountability themselves?” she asked.
The lawmaker has previously said that, if Roberts refuses to act to rein in the appalling corruption of Supreme Court justices, his legacy as chief justice will be forever tarnished.
“Barring some dramatic change, this is what the Roberts court will be known for: rank corruption, erosion of democracy, and the stripping of human rights,” Ocasio-Cortez said earlier this month, after ProPublica published the bombshell report regarding right-wing Justice Clarence Thomas that’s now spurring widespread calls for reform within the Supreme Court. She called for Thomas to be impeached over the revelations.
Roberts has indeed been heavily criticized over his refusal to testify, with critics noting that it is only the latest example of Roberts refusing to acknowledge ethics concerns regarding Thomas in past decades, as members of the Senate Judiciary Committee raised when they announced the hearing this month.
Indeed, his refusal to testify comes as reporters are uncovering a seemingly unprecedented level of corruption on the Supreme Court. Just in the past few weeks, reports have uncovered that Thomas has for decades received lavish gifts from and sold property to a GOP billionaire megadonor without disclosing it, and that Neil Gorsuch has skirted disclosure requirements to hide his property sale to the CEO of a major law firm that frequently appears before the Court.
The reports have shown that justices seemingly can’t even follow the lax rules that Supreme Court justices are legally bound to. Experts have said that Thomas’s failure to disclose his financial ties with billionaire Harlan Crow have broken disclosure laws, but that there is a culture of impunity for justices. Meanwhile, there seems to be little way to act against the glaring ethics concerns on display, because the Supreme Court is the only court in the U.S. that’s not legally bound to an ethics code.
Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee expressed deep frustration over Roberts’s refusal to testify, and have called for the Supreme Court to be bound to an ethics code.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) wrote that the fact that Roberts isn’t willing to enforce ethics guidelines means that there are essentially no rules regarding the Supreme Court.
“The gaping hole in today’s response from Roberts to the Senate Judiciary Committee is that it overlooks the complete failure of process regarding ethics questions involving the justices. When there’s no ref, there’s no rule, as a practical matter,” Whitehouse wrote. “The liberties that justices have taken are egregious, as they take advantage of there being no ref to read the rules to suit their convenience.”
Durbin criticized Roberts for ignoring the fact that Thomas has repeatedly violated not just ethics standards, but also disclosure laws. “I am surprised that the Chief Justice’s recounting of existing legal standards of ethics suggests current law is adequate and ignores the obvious. The actions of one Justice, including trips on yachts and private jets, were not reported to the public. That same Justice failed to disclose the sale of properties he partly owned to a party with interests before the Supreme Court,” Durbin said in a statement.
“It is time for Congress to accept its responsibility to establish an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Court, the only agency of our government without it,” he added.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 432 new monthly donors in the next 7 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy