Skip to content Skip to footer

Quality of Elections Has Suffered Globally for 8 Consecutive Years, Report Finds

Between 2020 and 2024, the losing candidate in nearly 20 percent of elections around the world rejected the outcome.

Rudy Giuliani, then-lawyer for then-President Donald Trump, speaks during a news conference about lawsuits contesting the results of the presidential election at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., on November 19, 2020.

A report published Tuesday by an intergovernmental watchdog paints an alarming picture of the state of global democracy, showing that the quality of elections has declined around the world and losing candidates are rejecting outcomes with growing frequency, further eroding trust in electoral processes and institutions.

The Stockholm-based International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) found in its annual report that last year was the worst the group has ever observed for “free and fair elections and parliamentary oversight.” It also marked the eighth consecutive year in which “overall democratic performance” declined rather than improved — the longest stretch since IDEA began collecting records in 1975.

“This report is a call for action to protect democratic elections,” Kevin Casas-Zamora, the group’s secretary-general, said in a statement. “Elections remain the single best opportunity to end democratic backsliding and turn the tide in democracy’s favor. The success of democracy depends on many things, but it becomes utterly impossible if elections fail.”

IDEA’s new analysis estimates that between 2020 and 2024, the losing candidate in nearly 20% of elections across the globe rejected the outcome. The report describes former U.S. President Donald Trump’s attacks on the 2020 election results and the violent insurrection that followed as “one of the most extreme examples” of election denial in recent years.

The report states that while “there have been some improvements” in U.S. elections since 2021, “the change is not enough to recover from the decline.” Trump is running for president again this year, and lawmakers and watchdogs have warned that he has laid the groundwork to deny the election results again should he lose in November.

Globally, one in three voters currently lives in a country where the quality of elections is in decline, according to IDEA. That decline has been accompanied by a fall in electoral participation, a reflection of eroding trust in the voting process.

The report urges governments to take a number of steps to improve electoral processes and trust in voting systems, from responding “vigilantly to unfounded accusations that seek to harm people’s perceptions of electoral integrity” to expanding ballot access in consultation with the public.

“If elections are to continue to act as the foundation stones of democratic systems, it is critical to reinforce public trust in them,” the report states. “Integrating popular opinion into the activities of the electoral cycle is one important step in this process.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.