Reports late Sunday that President-elect Joe Biden has decided to nominate Neera Tanden, head of the corporate-backed think tank Center for American Progress, to lead his budget office drew an icy reception from progressives, who pointed to the Democratic operative’s history of attacking policies such as Medicare for All and voicing support for Social Security cuts.
If confirmed as director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Tanden would be charged with crafting the Biden administration’s spending agenda — a task that has taken on even greater significance amid the coronavirus pandemic and an unprecedented economic calamity that calls for sweeping stimulus measures.
As Common Dreams reported last week, a coalition of progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups is warning Biden against selecting any deficit hawks to serve in his cabinet — specifically training their focus on austerity proponent Bruce Reed, an architect of Bill Clinton’s destructive “welfare reform” plan and head of an Obama-era commission that recommended deep cuts to Social Security.
While news that Reed is out of the running for OMB chief was welcomed by progressives, the selection of Tanden — who worked under Reed in the Clinton White House — also sparked concerns given her past comments on healthcare policy and Social Security.
“Everything toxic about the corporate Democratic Party is embodied in Neera Tanden,” tweeted Briahna Joy Gray, former national press secretary for Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) 2020 presidential campaign.
A Clinton loyalist with a penchant for demonizing progressives, Tanden was an architect of the Affordable Care Act and has since endorsed healthcare proposals like “Medicare for America,” a plan single-payer proponents have rejected as a false solution that would leave intact the most predatory elements of the for-profit system. As a representative of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, Tanden clashed with National Nurses United over Medicare for All during that year’s Democratic platform fight.
Tanden also has a history of expressing support for Social Security and Medicare cuts, as The Daily Poster’s Walker Bragman documented.
“We should have savings on entitlements, and the Center for American Progress has put forward ideas on proposals to reform the beneficiary structure of Social Security — some of our progressive allies aren’t as excited about that as we are,” Tanden said in a 2012 C-SPAN appearance. “But we’ve put those ideas on the table. We think that those are legitimate ideas that need to be part of a proposal where everyone’s at the table. We don’t just ask middle-class Americans to sacrifice. We ask all Americans.”
FLASHBACK: Neera Tanden and her Center for American Progress pushed cuts to Social Security after the 2010 midterms.
New from @dailyposter: https://t.co/mhLxYvEmpe pic.twitter.com/monUoNSMie
— Walker Bragman (@WalkerBragman) November 30, 2020
Though she’s frequently described in the media as a progressive, “leaked internal emails reveal Tanden’s own political instincts to depart from what is typically considered ‘progressive,'” Nathan Robinson of Current Affairs noted in 2018.
“She advised the Clinton campaign against a $15 minimum wage, and in one disturbing instance, as Glenn Greenwald has reported, argued ‘that Libyans should be forced to turn over large portions of their oil revenues to repay the U.S. for the costs incurred in bombing Libya, on the grounds that Americans will support future wars only if they see that the countries attacked by the U.S. pay for the invasions,'” Robinson wrote.
When it comes to OMB, the best thing you can say is that @neeratanden is not at all a deficit hawk, and that matters in that position. CAP took a risk to buck the White House in 2013 and come out against their deficit hysteria https://t.co/Xc3E45abWc pic.twitter.com/NwvwT7NSoL
— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) November 30, 2020
News that Biden intends to nominate Tanden for OMB came as the president-elect began to assemble a team of economic advisers which will inherit a crisis that has pushed millions into permanent unemployment, shuttered businesses across the nation, and left countless Americans unable to afford basic necessities.
“The former vice president has picked Cecilia Rouse, a Princeton University labor economist, to be chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers,” the Wall Street Journal reported. “The president-elect has selected Adewale ‘Wally’ Adeyemo, a former senior international economic adviser during the Obama administration, to serve as Ms. Yellen’s top deputy at the Treasury Department. And he will turn to two campaign economic advisers, Jared Bernstein and Heather Boushey, to serve as members of the CEA alongside Ms. Rouse.”
Justin Wolfers, a professor at the University of Michigan, praised Biden’s emerging team of economic advisers — which the former vice president is expected to formally announce this week — as “damn solid.”
“This is a group that is individually and collectively committed to both full employment, and boosting wages,” said Wolfers.
Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich offered a similar assessment, tweeting, “Excellent. All committed to full employment, boosting wages, reducing inequality.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.