Skip to content Skip to footer

Portland’s E. Coli Scare: How Mushrooms Could Have Helped Prevent It

Stropharia fungi. (Image: tonx / Flickr)

Stropharia fungi. (Image: <a href=tonx / Flickr)” width=”308″ height=”410″ />Stropharia fungi. (Image: tonx / Flickr)Last week, on May 23, the city of Portland, Ore., found a dangerous form of E. coli bacteria in the regional water supply. More than 670,000 people were warned to boil their tap water before drinking it, and some restaurants were forced to close. A few days later, the warning was lifted.

It’s not just about cleaner water but also about building greater biodiversity into the places where we live and work.

Infections from this type of bacteria are unpleasant but not usually deadly—in most cases the symptoms are limited to diarrhea, vomiting, and fevers. Yet, of the roughly 265,000 E. coli infections reported each year in the United States, 5 to 10 percent result in a potentially life-threatening complication known as hemolytic uremic syndrome, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

Mycologist Paul Stamets believes that cities like Portland should consider an out-of-the-box solution: running water through filters that contain fungi specially selected for their antibiotic abilities.

“Many of the pathogens that afflict us also afflict fungi,” Stamets says, so over the millennia they have evolved to be adept at killing and consuming bacteria. It’s the same basic principle that makes penicillin—an antibiotic molecule derived from a fungus—so effective.

The technology Stamets developed to harness this ability for use in municipal and rural water systems essentially consists of directing runoff water through wood chips or yard waste on which specific fungi are growing. He calls it “mycofiltration.”

Stamets is founder and owner at Fungi Perfecti, a company that develops and sells all sorts of mushroom-based products—from grow kits to skin products to calendars featuring “beautiful mushrooms of the world.” He has been toying with mycofiltration since the early 80s. After the EPA expressed concern about bacterial pollution stemming from old septic tanks in the neighborhood, Stamets tried running stream water through a mixture of yard waste and mushrooms.

Though that early test showed promising reductions in bacterial concentrations, that was just his backyard. When Stamets thought about developing the idea into a more widespread solution, a lot of questions came up: Would the fungi be able to survive the difficult conditions—including flooding, drought, heat, and cold—that they’d encounter in cities and rural areas around the world? Would water be able to flow around them at a sufficient pace? And just how effective would they be?

In 2012, Fungi Perfecti received an $80,000 grant from the EPA to dig more deeply into these questions. According to a report released last year, Stamets’ team tested 30 different types of mycofilters, which contained different species of fungus growing on various mixes of wood chips, sawdust, and straw. In the end, the best-performing species turned out to be the species from the genus Stropharia, commonly known as the “wine cap mushroom.” The wine caps—which are not only edible but considered a delicacy—consistently removed more than 20 percent of E. coli that flowed around it.

Stamets believes that mycofiltration could be integrated pretty easily with processes that already take place in places like Portland. For example, when branches are trimmed from around power lines, the resulting wood chips could be mixed with fungal spores and then used to line runoff ditches or the beds around trees, so that runoff water gets a bit of natural antibiotic treatment. It’s not unlike the way that cattails and other plants are already used to clean pollutants from water by cities like Arlington, Va., and by the U.S. Air Force.

And while the impact from that process might be small, Stamets is quick to point out that “more engineered designs” are also possible.

For Stamets, it’s not just about cleaner water but also about building greater biodiversity into the way we construct the places where we live and work.

“Biodiversity equals biosecurity,” he says. “As advanced as our computer systems are, our environmental systems are not keeping up with the pollution we create.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.