Skip to content Skip to footer

Oklahoma Republican’s Bill Would Fine Drag Performers $20K Over Shows for Kids

The proposal places “a target [on] drag performers,” one LGBTQ advocate said.

Rich Kuntz, also known as Gidget, reads to children during Drag Queen Story Hour on March 21, 2019.

A Republican lawmaker in the Oklahoma state legislature has proposed a bill that would criminalize certain drag performances that take place in public spaces.

The bill, authored by state Rep. Kevin West (R), wrongly claims that such performances are equivalent to 18-and-over entertainment, including adult dancing or situations where nudity is present. The bill’s text specifically singles out kid-friendly events that have no sexual connotations whatsoever — including the popular library reading program “Drag Queen Story Hour.”

West claims that the bill would still allow people to host drag performances in private areas. “It wouldn’t be allowed where just the general public would be able to see the performance. So like a library or a school or something like that would fall into being under the jurisdiction of this bill,” West told Business Insider.

But the bill’s parameters for what types of venues would be allowed to host drag shows are vague, including for G-rated performances where parents could voluntarily bring their children to be entertained.

“It shall be unlawful for a person to organize or authorize the viewing of a drag queen story hour on public property or in a location where the drag queen story hour could be viewed by a person who is a minor,” reads the bill, which is scheduled for a February 6 floor hearing in the Oklahoma state House of Representatives.

If the bill becomes law, private establishments like restaurants or bookstores could potentially be banned from hosting drag performances; those found in violation of the law would be subject to fines of up to $20,000 and could be imprisoned for as many as two years.

The bill is one of the latest legislative attacks on drag performers in statehouses across the country. Proposals that sexualize non-sexual drag events are part of a deeper line of attack on the greater LGBTQ community, wrote Washington Post gender and society columnist Monica Hesse last summer.

“The debate must be shifted ‘to sexualization,’ because without such a shift, there would be no debate,” Hesse said, adding that:

The uproar over such a sincerely wholesome event makes it plain what the issue really is: not parental rights. Not sexualization. Not the content of what the drag queens are reading to the kids. It’s the existence of drag queens. It’s the idea that someone might present in a way that was at odds with a certain vision of how men or women should dress or present or behave.

Nicole McAfee, executive director of Freedom Oklahoma, condemned the bill for placing a target on drag performers.

The bill would create “a situation that could put a lot of Oklahoma individual performers and small businesses out of business and create real harm in censoring expression of artists across the state,” McAfee said to Fox 25 in Oklahoma City.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.