Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.
A GOP-sponsored bill in Oklahoma, HB 3216, passed a legislative hurdle on Wednesday when it passed out of committee. HB 3216 would ban emergency contraception in the state and create a state database of people who have had an abortion.
“If the bill doesn’t get changed with the current wording then IUDs and Plan B could be inaccessible to women,” said State Rep. Trish Ranson (D).
Ranson also noted that she found it “highly concerning” that the legislation would seemingly allow the state to “track” people who have abortions. “I believe that there is an opportunity for tracking women. I believe that there is a major privacy issue that we should be concerned about,” she said.
Oklahoma currently has a near-total ban on abortion, permitting the procedure only under exceptionally restricted circumstances. According to the Guttmacher Institute, the state’s abortion policies are currently classified as “most restrictive.”
The bill, introduced by Republican State Rep. Kevin West, was crafted with input from the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)-designated hate group, after the state Supreme Court ruled that two recent anti-abortion laws were unconstitutional.
“Rep. Kevin West said himself that the current language in his anti-abortion bill, HB 3216, includes preventing access to IUDs and ‘over the counter”’ medications like Plan B,” Cindy Nguyen, Policy Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, said on social media.
This bill would create new requirements for physicians to report each abortion they perform and allow for physicians who violate this law to have their licenses suspended or revoked. The bill would also open avenues for civil lawsuits against individuals aiding a person in seeking an abortion.
“There is a relationship between patient and doctor that is sacred. And the fact that that would be… reported elsewhere, that there would be a number assigned to the woman is… just alarming,” Ranson said.
On Wednesday, the House Criminal Judiciary Committee also approved a bill that would allow prosecutors to bring felony trafficking charges against individuals found possessing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs. Under this bill, a person found in violation of the law faces 10 years in prison or $100,000 in fines.
These bills are part of a concerted effort by right-wing groups like the ADF to erode abortion and contraception access in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade. In November 2022, the ADF brought a legal challenge to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. The lawsuit, argued by the ADF, claimed that the presumed dead Comstock Act of 1873, which prohibited the dissemination of birth control through the mail “to prevent the mails from being used to corrupt the public morals,” prohibited access to and mailing of the abortion pill.
While the Supreme Court said in the Dobbs decision that undermining the constitutional right to an abortion was limited and would not endanger other substantive due process rights, such as the right to contraception, these bills and legal challenges show that far right legal organizations always intended to use the Dobbs decision to attack other body autonomy rights.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.