Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Occupy Has Raised Class Consciousness: Now What?

A protest by visiting and local Occupy Wall Street activists outside City Hall in Northampton, Massacusetts, February 2, 2012. (Photo: Nicole Bengiveno / The New York Times) The year 2011 will go down in history as the year in which citizens used their collective power to make economic justice part of the national conversation and force the media to focus on real issues rather than the manufactured deficit crisis. Last February, Wisconsinites began demonstrating and, eventually, occupying their state Capitol to stop attacks on public workers, collective bargaining and unions.

The year 2011 will go down in history as the year in which citizens used their collective power to make economic justice part of the national conversation and force the media to focus on real issues rather than the manufactured deficit crisis. Last February, Wisconsinites began demonstrating and, eventually, occupying their state Capitol to stop attacks on public workers, collective bargaining and unions.

Since Occupy Wall Street kicked off on September 17, Occupy demonstrators across the country have raised awareness about the widening wealth gap, inequality, rising student debt, criminal activity on Wall Street, poverty and home foreclosures.

Politico's Dylan Byers did a quick search of the news via Lexis Nexis and found a significant rise in the use of the term “income inequality,” from less than 91 instances in the week before Occupy Wall Street started to almost 500 instances in November 2011.

“The Occupy movement is an extraordinary breakthrough,” says David Korten, co-founder and board chair of YES! Magazine, and author of “Agenda for a New Economy.”

“On the progressive side, we tend to focus on individual issues. The Occupy movement has given us an overall framing umbrella with a focus on inequality. It may be one of the most effective branding exercises in history.”

“They tapped into something that millions and million of Americans obviously felt,” adds Gar Alperovitz, professor of political economy at the University of Maryland and author of “America Beyond Capitalism: Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty, and Our Democracy.”

“The response tells you far more about where most Americans are than we had known before. Those ideas touch something in the understanding of millions of people that something is profoundly wrong in America.”

We know what's wrong: 43 percent of Americans are “liquid assets poor,” meaning they lack the money to live for three months if their main source of income were lost, according to the Corporation for Enterprise Development. More than 46 million Americans are living in poverty and on food stamps, the highest number ever. More than 17 million women lived in poverty in 2010; over 7.5 million women live on less than $6,000 a year, according to the National Women's Law Center.

Listen to Your Call discuss economic victories that can be won and how we can keep income inequality in the conversation during an election year.

Fourteen million people are unemployed. Another 8 million are working part-time but want full-time work. The unemployment rate is far higher for women and communities of color.

Over 50 million Americans are uninsured. Another 50 million are underinsured. A 2009 Harvard study shows that 45,000 people die every year because they don't have health insurance.

Meantime, corporate profits continue to rise and corporations are sitting on a record amount of cash. Thanks in large part to record-high oil prices, ExxonMobil's 2011 profits rose 35 percent, to a whopping $41.1 billion. That's nearly $5 million in profit every hour, or more than $1,300 every second, according to ThinkProgress. Exxon pays a lower effective tax rate than most Americans and refuses to pay $92 million in cleanup costs for the Valdez Alaskan oil spill, but it had no problem paying CEO Rex Tillerson $29 million last year.

Despite massive oil profits, last May, 45 Republicans and three Democrats refused to repeal $21 billion in tax breaks over the next ten years for Exxon, BP, Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell and ConocoPhillips. The final vote was 52-48.

The one percent owns approximately 40 percent of the nation's wealth and almost half of all investment capital. Five percent own 70 percent of all investment capital.

“Those are medieval numbers,” says Alperovitz. “That's the way medieval society was organized. We need systemic change. Who owns the wealth is the primary question people should be asking.”

So, what are the solutions? What's on the top of your demands list? And what are some real victories that can be won this year?

Korten sees it as a two-front agenda. First, we need to weaken the power of Wall Street with state banks, a more aggressive tax system that includes tax hikes on the rich, a financial transaction tax and a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. Korten is also a big advocate of moving your money from the “too big to fail” banks to a credit union or community bank.

Second, we need to focus on growing and strengthening Main Street with local food movements, local sustainable energy initiatives and worker-owned cooperatives.

Alperovitz says it's important to note that over 130 million Americans now participate in cooperatives and credit unions. More than 13 million people are worker-owners of more than 11,000 employee-owned cooperatives.

“A different way of developing wealth is possible,” says Alperovitz. “There's a lot of power in that strategy, and it resonates with people who want to change the system and changes how community structures are built.”

Korten also says it's important to talk about the equal distribution of ownership because it gets to the systemic root of the issue. “That is what ultimately moves us toward a more equal distribution of income, which research shows is the foundation of almost every essential aspect of a healthy society.”

And despite what you hear from politicians on all sides, the United States is not broke. Alperovitz points out that even in its doldrums, the economy produces just under $200,000 for every family of four. “The economy is not poor,” he says. “The potential here is for a very rich society. The challenge is making it more equitable.”

“The solutions are not going to come from within the political system,” says Korten. “The real action and solutions are going to have to come from the bottom up, from people rebuilding their local economies.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy