Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) is gathering support in the House for a bill aimed at overturning a recent Supreme Court decision ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is limited in its authority to regulate carbon emissions — a decision that could have devastating consequences for the climate.
Earlier this month, Ocasio-Cortez introduced the EPA Regulatory Authority Act of 2022, a bill that’s narrowly crafted to focus on amending the Clean Air Act, which gives the EPA the authority to regulate air pollution, in order to specifically allow the EPA to identify and reduce emissions from polluters like power plants.
Now, according to E&E News, the congresswoman is shopping around for support for the bill, hoping that it will pass the House even if there’s little chance of it passing the Senate. She says that the bill has about a dozen cosponsors so far.
The bill may be shot down in the Senate, where coal millionaire Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) just killed Congress’s last best chance to pass climate legislation, Ocasio-Cortez says — but its passage in the House would be a strong rebuke against the Supreme Court.
On the last day of the Supreme Court’s term last month, it handed down its decision for West Virginia v. EPA, ruling with plaintiffs who argued that the agency doesn’t have the power to regulate carbon emissions.
It was a case brought against the Barack Obama-era Clean Power Plan, which, if it were ever implemented, would have allowed the EPA to govern power plants to limit their impacts on the climate crisis. The Clean Power Plan was never in effect, but the Supreme Court essentially ruled against it anyway. Along with Manchin’s climate obstruction, the decision could put the country further on the path of major climate destruction. Without further mitigation for the climate crisis, many parts of Earth may be no longer livable for human beings within decades.
However, it’s unclear if Ocasio-Cortez’s bill even has the votes to pass the House. House Natural Resources Committee Chair Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) and conservative Democrat Rep. Kurt Schrader (Oregon) have both thrown cold water on the idea, E&E found. Huffman said that changing the Clean Air Act in Congress could come with risks, while Schrader, who was key in killing Democrats’ major climate bill last year, said that Congress should focus on other priorities right now.
Ocasio-Cortez recognized the criticisms of her bill, which she said was “a little difficult to understand.”
“I think sometimes there’s this framing of these issues being more complex than they are, but the legislation is quite straightforward,” she said.
If Ocasio-Cortez is able to gather the votes to pass the bill, it would be the fifth bill passed by the House in recent months directly aimed at preempting or combating rulings by the Supreme Court’s far right justices. Last week, the House passed two bills aimed at protecting contraception access and the right to same sex marriage. And earlier this month, the chamber passed bills protecting abortion access and the right of abortion seekers to travel across state lines for the procedure.
Most of these bills would almost certainly get struck down in the Senate, except for the bill protecting same sex marriage, which Senate Republicans say has the support among their caucus to overcome the 60-vote filibuster.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.