In wake of evidence revealing ties between Ginni Thomas — the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas — and Donald Trump’s plot to overturn the 2020 election, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) has called for Clarence Thomas to resign.
Recent reporting has revealed that conservative activist Ginni Thomas played a role in organizing January 6 attackers, and attended the “Stop the Steal” rally outside the White House before the crowd marched to the Capitol. Last week, leaked texts revealed that she had encouraged Trump’s former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, to move forward with the plot to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
“Clarence Thomas should resign,” Ocasio-Cortez said on Tuesday. “If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the January 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment.”
About a decade ago, Clarence Thomas failed to disclose payments to his wife from the Koch-funded Heritage Foundation, which had paid Ginni Thomas $680,000 over the course of four years. In his decades as a Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas has not recused himself from any case related to his wife’s right-wing activism. He was also the only justice to vote in January to grant Trump’s request to block the release of January 6-related presidential documents.
Ocasio-Cortez later warned on Twitter that if Democrats don’t take up a vote to impeach Clarence Thomas — a process that is similar to the impeachment process for presidents — they could face political consequences later.
When she and other Democrats pushed for Trump’s first impeachment in 2019 over his extortion of the Ukrainian government, Ocasio-Cortez said, some top Democrats were skeptical, saying that it would come back and hurt their party. But in hindsight, it would have been irresponsible for Congress to ignore the issue, and Democrats would have ended up shouldering the blame, she said.
“When we look back at the decision to impeach Trump over Ukraine today, could you imagine if the naysayers and those claiming to be ‘politically savvier’ won?” said Ocasio-Cortez. “WE would be explaining why we allowed it to happen instead of the Senate explaining why they acquitted.”
Ocasio-Cortez continued, tying Trump’s impeachment to the current situation with Clarence Thomas. “Often what seems like the righteous yet politically foolish thing short term ends up being the wisest choice long term,” she said. “All this is to say we shouldn’t dismiss actions available re: Clarence Thomas’s acts.”
A group of congressional Democrats sent a letter to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking for Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from cases related to January 6 or the plot to overturn the 2020 election. “[G]iven the recent disclosures about Ms. Thomas’s efforts to overturn the election and her specific communications with White House officials about doing so, Justice Thomas’s participation in cases involving the 2020 election and the January 6th attack is exceedingly difficult to reconcile with federal ethics requirements,” the lawmakers wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.