Skip to content Skip to footer

Obama Puts Bark in Consumer Watchdog: Elizabeth Warren

Washington - President Barack Obama's decision to appoint Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren on Friday to oversee the creation of the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection cheered consumer advocates and Democrats Thursday

Washington – President Barack Obama’s decision to appoint Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren on Friday to oversee the creation of the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection cheered consumer advocates and Democrats Thursday, while dismaying Republicans and business groups.

Warren was one of the intellectual architects of the new bureau, created by the recent legislation to overhaul financial regulations. The agency is mandated to guard against dangers to consumers from financial products such as mortgages and credit cards, much as the Consumer Product Safety Commission does for toys or jewelry tainted by lead.

A specialist in contract law who rose to national prominence from humble Oklahoma roots, Warren is loved by consumer advocates for her charge-ahead style — and loathed by many business groups for the same reason.

Because she’s a lightning rod, she faced a tough Senate confirmation fight if Obama nominated her to head the new bureau for a five-year term as its formal director. The Senate battle could’ve lasted months.

To avoid that, Obama chose to make her an assistant to the president and special adviser to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, a staff position that doesn’t require Senate confirmation. The White House will announce her appointment on Friday, an administration official told McClatchy on condition of anonymity because the announcement’s not yet public.

Even without being named the bureau’s director, Warren’s expected to wield broad power — hiring the staff and setting the mission. Once she’s got the bureau up and running, Obama can appoint a formal director, to whom Warren could pass the baton of leadership, the administration official said.

Consumer advocates were thrilled.

“We at the National Consumer Law Center have worked with Elizabeth Warren for years and are excited that she will be instrumental in setting the course for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Elizabeth has a deep understanding of the needs of consumers and the ways in which the financial system has let them down,” the advocacy group said in a statement.

In a similar statement, the group Americans for Financial Reform said, “As financial reform moves through the treacherous path of regulation writing, Wall Street is busy trying to thwart regulators from doing the job Congress laid out — keeping the big banks in check. With Elizabeth Warren leading the way, and the public keeping up its vigilance, they will not succeed.”

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce was appalled.

“By not allowing Ms. Warren’s nomination to be considered through the regular order of the full Senate confirmation process, the administration has circumvented one of the very few checks on a big new agency that already has been given an unprecedented concentration of regulatory powers,” David Hirschmann, the president of the chamber’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness, said in a statement. “This maneuver is an affront to the pledge of transparency and consumer protection that’s purported to be the focus of this new agency.”

Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, also was unhappy.

“This agency has enormous, wide-ranging powers, and we can only assess that in a thorough confirmation process. I regret the president is circumventing that process. It’s not about Elizabeth Warren. What the president has done raises a very critical question about the direction the president intends to take with the bureau. There are a lot of issues to be explored. To do this in the shadows is only going to facilitate more cynicism,” Snowe told McClatchy.

Join with your fellow readers in keeping independent journalism strong! Support Truthout with a donation by clicking here.

On the other hand, Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., a Senate Banking Committee member, was delighted.

“It’s a superb appointment by the White House. The bill is structured so the agency would be set up in Treasury. She’s just the right person to be leading the effort.”

Republicans consider Warren hostile to the financial services sector. However, she wears that as a badge of honor, unabashedly critical of how banks duped homeowners and credit card holders in the run-up to the financial system’s near collapse in 2008.

In “Capitalism: A Love Story,” by liberal filmmaker Michael Moore, Warren made clear her distaste for bank-underwritten mortgages that she felt were wrong for many consumers.

“Financial products, and they are products just like posters, are sold today with the most dangerous features embedded in them because that’s what drives profitability,” she said in an interview that’s an extra on the DVD version. “You can’t buy a toaster in America that has a one-in-five chance of exploding, but you can buy a mortgage that has a one-in-five chance of exploding, and they don’t have to tell you about it.”

“We have consumer protection for everything you touch, taste, feel . . . but there’s no equivalent for credit cards, for mortgages, there’s nothing,” Warren added.

Warren’s had a prickly relationship with Geithner, who on paper will be one of her two bosses, Obama being the other.

As the head of the special Congressional Oversight Panel looking into how bank bailout funds are spent, she’s clashed repeatedly with Geithner for what she said was a lack of cooperation and transparency. Warren’s panel also issued a scathing report last October condemning the lack of progress in the Obama administration’s efforts to stem foreclosures.

(David Lightman contributed to this article.)

ELIZABETH WARREN: AT A GLANCE

_ A Harvard University School of Law professor, specializing in contract law.

_ The author of two best-selling books, The Two Income Trap, and All Your Worth.

_ A former chief adviser to National Bankruptcy Review Commission.

_ A member of the Economic Inclusion Committee of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

_ Named by National Law Journal as one of top 50 most influential women attorneys.

_ A former Sunday School teacher with law degree from Rutgers University, and an undergraduate degree from the University of Houston.

_ Born on June 22, 1949, in Oklahoma City and raised in Norman, Okla.

ON THE WEB

Warren’s Michael Moore Interview

Warren on the Daily Show in January

Warren on the Daily Show in April 2009 (two parts)

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.