Skip to content Skip to footer

Obama in Boston: Was it Enough to Turn Senate Race for Coakley?

President Obama brought the energy from his 2008 campaign to Boston Sunday in a rally for Democrat Martha Coakley. She's locked in a tight race with Scott Brown to succeed the late Ted Kennedy in the US Senate.

President Obama brought the energy from his 2008 campaign to Boston Sunday in a rally for Democrat Martha Coakley. She’s locked in a tight race with Scott Brown to succeed the late Ted Kennedy in the US Senate.

——

Boston – With only two days left in the race for Massachusetts’ open US Senate seat, President Obama delivered exactly what Democratic candidate Martha Coakley was hoping for: the potential for a momentum shift.

In recent weeks, Republican Scott Brown had turned the race toward the economic issues that are angering so many voters: high unemployment numbers, worries about healthcare reform, and the soaring federal deficit.

His success has imperiled Mr. Obama’s agenda. If he wins – and weekend polls showed the race even – the Democrats will lose their filibuster-proof 60-seat majority in the Senate.

Led by Obama Sunday, Ms. Coakley tried to turn the voters’ anger on its head. The frustration was justified, they said, but it was misplaced.

“We have had one year to make up for eight,” a dressed down Obama told the crowd, referencing the eight years of the Bush administration. “It hasn’t been quick, it hasn’t been easy…. But we’ve begun to deliver on the change you voted for.”

It was his exhortation to motivate Democrats and independents with sour memories of the Bush years: “We don’t want to go backwards to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place,” he said.

Coakley the “Incumbent”

It was also a clear attempt to change how Massachusetts voters view Coakley.

Without an incumbent in the race to fill the seat vacated by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, Coakley has become a stand-in for Washington in many voters’ minds. She is Massachusetts’ attorney general and is well recognized in the state.

As such, she is suffering from the anti-incumbent attitude currently sweeping much of the nation. Mr. Brown has worked to emphasize this image, calling Coakley a “machine politician” at a rally timed to coincide with Obama’s.

“Now voters think a vote for her is a vote for what’s going on in Washington,” says Dan Payne, a Democratic media consultant based in Massachusetts. “She’s got to deal with Washington issues that she had never intended to be a part of her campaign.”

With Sunday’s rally and a similar event Friday with former President Bill Clinton, Coakley sought to turn those connections to her advantage. Obama brought to the Coakley campaign some of the enthusiasm that led him to victory in 2008.

A crowd 1,500 strong chanted “fired up, ready to go” – a slogan from Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign – while waiting for the event to begin and screamed “We love you Barack!” during pauses in his speech. Another 2,500 people watched a live broadcast in a Northeastern University student center nearby, and still thousands more were turned away, the Coakley campaign said.

The Importance of Obama

Indeed, for many Massachusetts voters, who voted Obama into office in 2008 by a 26-percentage point margin over Sen. John McCain, just having the president campaign in the state was enough to make an impression.

“It let me know how serious it is,” says Jeremy Smith, a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. Mr. Smith wasn’t planning to vote before Obama’s visit but says that now, even though he wasn’t able to make it into the rally, he plans to cast a ballot for Coakley on Tuesday.

“Living in a heavily blue [Democratic] state, you can lose sight of the fact that your vote matters,” said Smith, who volunteered for Obama’s presidential campaign. “If it wasn’t serious to Obama’s agenda, he wouldn’t have come.”

Steve Moran works in the health insurance industry and said he was also undecided before Sunday’s rally. “I hadn’t made a clear choice,” he said. But after attending the rally, he said he will likely vote for Coakley.

“It’s important enough to bring the president here,” he explained.

That’s exactly the message Obama hoped to impart.

“If you were fired up in the last election, I need you more fired up in this election,” he said.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.