President Obama took the historic step Friday of naming an openly gay man to head the Army, a nomination that, if confirmed, would be a first for the nation‘s military services.
In light of past controversies over gay military service and President Bill Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, Obama’s promotion of Army Acting Undersecretary Eric Fanning to the largest service’s top post could face hurdles in the Republican-controlled Senate.
Several GOP presidential candidates have criticized the Supreme Court’s June 26 ruling, in a 5-4 decision, that gay couples have a constitutional right to marry, and homosexuality remains a divisive topic within the largely conservative military.
“Eric brings many years of proven experience and exceptional leadership to this new role,” Obama said in nominating Fanning to be secretary of the Army. “I am grateful for his commitment to our men and women in uniform, and I am confident he will lead America’s soldiers with distinction. I look forward to working with Eric to keep our Army the very best in the world.”
Fanning, 47, who has held a handful of lower Pentagon posts, would replace current Army Secretary John McHugh, a former New York state congressman who has held the job for six years.
Praising Fanning’s “sound judgment and insight,” McHugh said: “Our soldiers, civilians and their families will benefit greatly from his leadership.”
While the Senate confirmed McHugh, who had been the senior Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, by unanimous voice vote in September 2009, Fanning is unlikely to enjoy such a smooth confirmation path.
A native of Kalamazo, Mich. and a Dartmouth College graduate, Fanning served as chief of staff to Defense Secretary Ash Carter from mid-February through June, when Carter named him acting undersecretary of the Army.
In congratulating Fanning for his nomination to the top post, Carter put the Senate on notice against any political opposition.
“President Obama has made an excellent choice, and I hope for a quick Senate confirmation,” Carter said.
Because he was in an acting, or temporary, role as Army undersecretary, Fanning did not face a Senate confirmation vote before assuming that post on June 30. He also served as acting secretary of the Air Force for six months in 2013.
The Senate did confirm Fanning by a voice vote as undersecretary of the Air Force in April 2013, but he would hold a much more visible post in becoming a top Pentagon official as secretary of the Army, the oldest and largest of the country’s five main military services.
Although the number of soldiers on active duty recently fell below 500,000 for the first time since 1996, to 490,000, the Army still makes up 36 percent of American military personnel.
Gay and human rights groups hailed Obama’s selection of Fanning to lead the Army.
“History continues to be written, and equality marches forward with the nomination of an openly gay man to serve in this significantly important role,” said Ashley Broadway-Mack, head of the American Military Partner Association, which represents gay military families.
The Human Rights Campaign, an advocacy organization for gay, bisexual and transgender Americans, also applauded Fanning’s promotion.
“Considering the tremendous struggles that LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) Americans have faced within the Department of Defense, Fanning’s nomination is deeply significant,” said Chad Griffin, the group’s head. “This is a sign of hope and a demonstration of continued progress towards fairness and equality in our nation’s armed forces.”
Pope Francis, who will address Congress next week as part of a visit to Washington, New York and Philadelphia, also has put the issue of gay rights in the news by declining to repudiate homosexuality with the same fervor as most of his predecessors.However, more than four hours after news broke of Obama’s nomination of Fanning, there was little public praise of the choice from lawmakers or from current or former Pentagon leaders, save from Carter, McHugh, the man he would replace, and Gen. Mark Milley, who as Army chief of staff would report directly to Fanning.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest was asked Friday why Obama had invited a gay Episcopal bishop and a transgender Catholic activist to join a South Lawn ceremony welcoming Pope Francis.
“We would expect a wide variety of Americans who are enthused about the opportunity to see the pope,” Earnest said. “And I think that reflects the pope’s stature and the significance of his visit, and the way that he has inspired so many Americans, including a bunch of us that aren’t Catholic.”
Fanning, who was White House associate political director in 1996 under Clinton, has been active in the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund, which supports homosexual, bisexual and transgender candidates for elective office.
Fanning has also urged the Pentagon to adopt a policy that would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Clinton set the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in February 1994. That policy, which was controversial from the start and caused some confusion in the ranks, prohibited discrimination against perceived homosexuality in the military, but it also prohibited gays from serving openly in the armed services.
Congress passed legislation repealing the policy in December 2010, and a federal appellate court rejected its ban on openly gay military service seven months later. Days after the July 2011 court ruling, Obama sent Congress official certification that openly gay service would not harm U.S. military readiness.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 24 hours to add 180 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.