It has now been just over a week since the 45th president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, was inaugurated. In that time, popular demonstrations have exploded across the country, reaching their recent pinnacle with what is likely the largest protest in American history, the Women’s March on Washington (and its many offshoots in all 50 states). These uprisings portend a strong and multifaceted opposition to Trump’s presidency. They also point to what is likely to be a definitive feature of the next four years.
Nonviolent resistance, it seems, is on the rise.
As Gene Sharp (often called the “father of nonviolent revolution”) underscores, institutional procedures are often unavailable to confront “conflicts that, in one way or another, involve fundamental principles of a society, of independence, of self-respect, or of people’s capacity to determine their own future.” He goes on to say that when such conflicts come to the fore — as they have in our own society of late — there are conventionally thought to be two courses of action: passive submission or violence. Sharp highlights that there is, however, a third way, that of nonviolent struggle.
Whether it is the pragmatic nonviolence of Sharp, or the principled nonviolence of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., this form of resistance is particularly well-suited for the age of Donald Trump.
Trump is a self-styled negotiator, a badge of honor that he has carried into the presidency and that is epitomized in his book,The Art of the Deal.Nonviolent activists, the seasoned and newcomers alike, would do well to take note of this, as widespread civil resistance has the potential to be effectively leveraged at the negotiating table, leading to progress on the myriad issues represented in the burgeoning opposition movement.
In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King affirms this notion, pointing out, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”
If individuals and organizations continue to take to the streets and stand up for the rights of women, immigrants, refugees and marginalized communities; if we relentlessly find innovative ways to confront common challenges such as climate change, racial injustice and rising inequality; and if we are resolute in upholding the freedom of the press, respect for truth in a world of “alternative facts,” and a government that works for all Americans, a creative disorder will ensue and the negotiator-in-chief will have no choice but to come to the table.
Many have lamented the actions taken by President Trump during his first week in office, but there is cause for optimism. Conflict — the likes of which we’ve seen between the new administration and the rising opposition — has to see the light of day before it can be resolved and progress can be made. Nonviolent resistance is the best tool to facilitate this process. As Veronique Dudouet, a scholar well-versed in civil resistance and conflict transformation comments, “… it magnifies existing social and political tensions, by imposing greater costs on those who want to maintain their advantages under an existing system.”
Nonviolent resistance is likely to thrive in the age of Trump, as the events of recent days foreshadow. This, however, is nothing to fear. On the contrary, if the resistance is executed creatively and consistently, it is the best weapon we can employ in combatting fear and injustice. Nonviolent resistance at its best expands our collective notion of “We the People,” and is a win-win for each and every component of the American mosaic.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.