Skip to content Skip to footer

New Book Details How Trump Wanted to Use Pandemic to Cancel 2020 Election

In public statements, Trump frequently downplayed the threat of coronavirus to the American public.

President Donald Trump listens during a meeting with healthcare executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House on April 14, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

Even though he frequently sought to downplay the threat that coronavirus posed to the country in public statements, behind the scenes former President Donald Trump had apparently suggested the pandemic ought to be used to delay or even cancel the 2020 presidential election.

Trump had insinuated the possibility of doing so in tweets in late July, making the baseless statement that mail-in ballots would make the election “the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT” in U.S. history. But according to a new book by journalist Michael Wolff, “Landslide: The Final Days of the Trump Presidency,” the former president also asked his chief of staff and others about canceling the election in a more direct manner.

Earlier in July, Trump talked to his chief of staff Mark Meadows about the idea of “calling it off,” referring to the election. “People can’t get to the polls. It’s a national emergency. Right?” Trump said, per Wolff’s book.

After Meadows explained that there isn’t a constitutional way to do so, Trump pressed the issue more. “I’m sure there might be a way, but … well …” Wolff quoted Trump as saying.

A few days later, he brought up the idea once again, this time to former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who was helping Trump with debate preparations.

Trump told Christie he was thinking of calling things off. Christie thought he meant the debate prep, but Trump elaborated that it was the election that he was considering canceling.

“No, the election — too much virus,” Trump reportedly said to Christie.

Christie responded that he can’t do that, according to those who spoke to Wolff about the issue.

“You do know, you can’t declare martial law. You do know that, right?” Christie apparently added.

According to the Constitution, only Congress may initiate the change of federal election dates. The president has no power or authority to do so on their own.

Trump’s comments to his White House and campaign staff in July came at a time when he was down significantly in the polls against his main opponent to whom he eventually lost in the 2020 race, President Joe Biden. According to an aggregate of polling data collected by Real Clear Politics, Biden was leading Trump at that time by around 7 percentage points.

Trump’s suggestion of using COVID-19 as a pretext for delaying or canceling the election would have likely been met with heavy resistance, given that he downplayed its threat to the American people throughout the pandemic, wrongly stating on several occasions that it was no more deadly than the common flu.

In addition to Wolff’s collection of accounts regarding the Trump administration’s final days, a number of other books are also being released, which detail similar disturbing comments that the former president made while in office. Journalist Michael Bender, in his new book “Frankly, We Did Win This Election”: The Inside Story of How Trump Lost, also showcases how Trump became an apologist for Adolf Hitler during a trip to Europe in 2018.

Trump had traveled across the Atlantic Ocean to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I. While there, Trump’s chief of staff John Kelly was briefing him on the various players in that conflict. That history lesson included Kelly connecting “the dots from the First World War to the Second World War and all of Hitler’s atrocities,” Bender’s book said.

Trump interrupted the lesson to describe Hitler in positive terms.

“Well, Hitler did a lot of good things,” he reportedly said.

The remarks “stunned” Kelly, Bender’s book goes on to say, and the chief of staff told Trump “he was wrong.” Trump was “undeterred” and continued to defend Hitler’s actions, particularly on the economy of Germany in the 1930s.

“Kelly pushed back again, and argued that the German people would have been better off poor than subjected to the Nazi genocide,” Bender wrote.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.