The vast majority of Americans back the passage of a federal bill that would codify marriage rights for same-sex couples, according to new polling.
A Politico/Morning Consult survey conducted over the weekend asked Americans for their views on legislation being considered by the Senate this month that would enshrine marriage equality as a protected right. Nearly 6 in 10 Americans — 59 percent — say they support the legislation, while just 29 percent say they oppose the measure.
Opposition to the bill comes almost strictly from the right. According to the poll, 75 percent of registered Democratic-leaning voters back the proposal, as do 62 percent of independents. Meanwhile, just 38 percent of self-identified Republicans support the bill, while 50 percent say they’re opposed.
Given the Supreme Court’s conservative majority and increasing embrace of right-wing extremism, Democrats fear that marriage equality protections may be endangered. In a concurring ruling in the Supreme Court case this summer overturning abortion rights, Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that the Court reexamine all previous cases that established protections based on privacy rights, which would include Obergefell v. Hodges, the case that recognized marriage equality as the law of the land in 2015.
The Respect for Marriage Act aims to ensure that the Supreme Court’s previous action on marriage equality cannot be undone. The bill would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which was passed in the mid-1990s and presently lays dormant due to Obergefell; should the Court undo the precedent it established seven years ago, the law would once again go into effect at the federal level, defining marriage as being solely between one man and one woman. The Respect for Marriage Act would prevent this outcome and overrule laws established at the state level that enshrine homophobic definitions of marriage.
Democrats in the House of Representatives passed the bill with the support of only 47 GOP lawmakers. To pass the bill in the Senate, at least 10 Republicans will have to join with Democrats to defeat the filibuster that is expected from the remaining GOP caucus.
Senators negotiating with Republicans who are considering backing the bill say they are optimistic they will find the votes for the legislation to pass sometime this month, though they have not yet found the 10 votes needed.
Although some Republicans have expressed support for the bill, a number of Republicans, including Sens. Marco Rubio (Florida) and Ron Johnson (Wisconsin), have disparaged the bill as being unnecessary, with the former calling it a “stupid waste of time.”
Democratic leaders have condemned those comments, pointing out that the Supreme Court has made the bill’s passage critical.
“Let’s remember why a vote on the Respect for Marriage [Act] is necessary,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said to ABC News last week. “Millions upon millions of American women had their right taken away by the extremist MAGA Supreme Court in the Dobbs decision. And in a concurring opinion Justice [Clarence] Thomas opened the door for the Supreme Court going even further.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.