In Ohio, a transgender candidate was removed from the ballot for not including her previous name under a seldom-used, decades-old law. Vanessa Joy was informed on Wednesday that, despite collecting enough signatures to run, her petition to run for office was denied by the Stark County Election Commission according to news first reported by local journalist Morgan Trau of Ohio. The law requires any candidate running for office to include name changes on their petition if the name change occurred within the last five years. At least two other transgender candidates could be impacted by this law, which seems to have been selectively enforced against Joy.
The law, enacted in 1995, mandates that any candidate who has had “a change of name within five years immediately preceding” filing for office must list their former name in the nominating petition. This effectively requires all transgender candidates to list their deadname — the name transgender people typically abandon when they transition — on their petitions. This requirement is waived for many reasons, including name changes due to marriage. There is no such exception for transgender people.
Joy, who was running for House District 50 in Stark County, successfully collected enough signatures for office. She had no primary challenger, meaning she was going to automatically become the party’s nominee in the district. She was slated to run against Matthew Kishman after the previous officeholder, Representative Reggie Stoltzfus, announced a run for congress, leaving the office vacant. Now, because her petition was denied, she cannot even run as a write-in candidate in the district due to Ohio laws barring candidates with disqualified petitions from write-in campaigns.
Joy, when asked about the decision, tells Erin In The Morning that there was no information that such a signature was required. The 33 page candidacy guide put out by the secretary of state does not list any such requirement and listed on the Stark County website has no such information. The candidacy petition form does not have any space for listing an old name, either. Joy provided copies of her form showing that indeed, there is no indication or space for listing an old name, as you can see here:
Vanessa Joy, when asked about the action taken by the local county commission, states that she is “one of the first, if not the first, people that this law has been applied to in Ohio.”
The law appears to have been selectively enforced against Joy – other transgender candidates do not appear to have had their candidacies disqualified by the law. It is unclear if action may be taken against those candidates after their petitions have been accepted, however; the Republican party of Ohio could potentially weaponize this against trans candidates across the state.
Ohio is not the only state where this issue may arise. At least one other state has a similar filing requirement, although the requirement does not appear to be in place in most states. Michigan’s election law includes a provision that states that name changes within 10 years must be disclosed. Michigan’s law also waives those requirements for people changing their name because of marriage:
When asked about her next steps, Joy says, “I’m still exploring options, but my hope is that I can get legal representation to challenge the wording of this law and make it more inclusive to trans folx. The law already has an exception for changing names via marriage, and for people who have already notified voters of the name change on previous petitions.”
This piece was republished with permission from Erin In The Morning.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.