Former Vice President Mike Pence is reportedly planning to oppose a grand jury subpoena from the Department of Justice (DOJ) that is seeking his testimony and any documents he has relating to former President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The DOJ’s investigation into Trump, led by special counsel Jack Smith, is examining Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, the day of the attack on the U.S. Capitol building by a mob of his loyalists. The investigation is also looking into a scheme by the Trump campaign team to use fake electors to upend the Electoral College certification ceremony, which Pence presided over in his role as vice president.
Though Trump had tried to enlist Pence in the plot, the former vice president had refused to go along with it after his lawyers said it could be illegal. Trump continued to pressure Pence while the attack on the Capitol was unfolding, even as his loyalists gathered outside the White House chanting that Pence should be hanged.
While Pence has denounced the former president’s actions that day, he has not cooperated with investigations to determine the extent of Trump’s role in the attack — most notably the investigation by the House select committee in the last session of Congress.
Pence had attempted to justify his refusal to cooperate by claiming that the January 6 committee had “no right” to his testimony due to his executive privilege. His strategy to oppose the subpoena from the DOJ — which is part of the executive branch — is claiming that his role as president of the Senate, which is conferred on to vice presidents by the Constitution, renders him unable to divulge his conversations regarding the attack.
At issue is the “Speech or Debate” Clause in Article I Section 6 of the Constitution, which says that, “for any speech or debate in either House, [legislative lawmakers] shall not be questioned in any other place.”
“He thinks that the ‘speech or debate’ clause is a core protection for Article I, for the legislature. He feels it really goes to the heart of some separation of powers issues,” one source with knowledge of Pence’s plan said to Politico.
Pence will address his plan to oppose the subpoena when he makes a public appearance in Iowa on Wednesday, sources say.
Legal experts have questioned Pence’s strategy to use the “Speech or Debate” clause to shield himself from testifying.
“Pence claiming protection under that clause…seems like a stretch,” said Noah Bookbinder, president of the nonprofit government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).
Pence, who is likely to announce a 2024 presidential run, may be refusing to cooperate with the subpoena in order to avoid alienating far right voters he’ll need to win the GOP nomination.
“This feels to me more like Pence trying to maintain political support by not cooperating with the 1/6 special counsel investigation than a strong legal position,” Bookbinder said. “It’s disappointing because Pence knows firsthand how important accountability for this attack on our democracy is.”
Former U.S. acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal has also questioned Pence’s strategy.
“This doesn’t seem particularly strong, especially in light of the criminal nature of the 1/6 investigation,” Katyal tweeted.
Katyal pointed out that the Democratic-controlled Senate could compel Pence to cooperate through a subpoena, saying such a move is “something they can&should do immediately.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.