Regimes in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have been using US products to censor anti-government protesters voicing their dissent on the Internet.
The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that governments in the Middle East are buying content-filtering software from American companies that allows them to prevent access to web sites that many protesters use to organize movements for political reform. While the Qaddafi regime in Libya resorted to a total Internet shutdown the first week of March, other Middle East governments have turned to products built by McAfee Inc., Networks Inc. and Blue Coast Systems Inc., among other companies, in order to block web sites that allow protesters to share videos and congregate on Facebook.
As social media becomes a more useful tool in staging revolutions, pro-democracy bloggers and online activists have seen a growing backlash from governments who arrest and beat them to stifle dissent. Now the regimes' oppressive tactics have followed the protesters online.
Canada-based Netsweeper Inc. has also sold Internet-blocking technology to buyers in the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Yemen, while the Boeing-owned surveillance company Narus helped Egyptian government forces filter and track sources of communication.
Web-blocking technology is used in the US to prevent users from surfing pornography sites in schools or public libraries and protecting ISPs from viruses and other cyber attacks. To tackle the problem of those technologies being used to clamp down on political dissent, the State Department has put $20 million into software that helps citizens in the Middle East dodge Internet censorship. When foreign governments utilize US products “to filter for political purposes, we are involved in producing and distributing software to get around those efforts,” a senior State Department official told The Wall Street Journal.
Likewise, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said last year, “Censorship should not be in any way accepted by any company from anywhere. And in America, American companies need to take a principled stand.”
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) wrote last month for Politico, “The Internet has helped activists from Morocco to Iran organize demonstrations and publicize human rights abuses … With a few notable exceptions, the technology industry is failing to address serious human rights challenges.”
“US technology companies allow millions around the world to express themselves more fully and freely. But the industry has a moral obligation to ensure that its products and services do not help repressive governments,” Durbin wrote.
But Ahmed Aldoseri, director of information and communication technologies at the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority in Bahrain, told The Wall Street Journal, “[the] culture that we have in the Middle East is much more conservative than in the US,” and that freedom of speech is only guaranteed “as long as it remains within general politeness.”
A statement from McAfee Inc. said the company “has no control over, or visibility into how an organization implements its own filtering policy.”
When pro-democracy demonstrations began in Tunisia in January, a wave of anti-government revolutions rippled across the Middle East. Prior to the uprisings, Tunisia was ranked alongside China as the world's second-worst online performer.
Prominent Chinese blogger and activist Ran Yufei was arrested Monday for inciting subversion of state power.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.