In a macho violation of common sense and the needs of hundreds of millions of people living in crushing poverty, the ruling elite of India (that’s the government and multinational corporations who own the country) recently launched a satellite that “after a journey of 300 days and 420 million miles…arrived to orbit around Mars,” reported The Guardian. The $74 million “Mars mission” is “cheap by American (or Chinese) standards,” The Economist says, but amounts to a fraction of a much more expensive – not to say insane – space program that drains US $1 billion a year from the national budget, a sum, which “is more than spare change, even for a near $2-trillion economy.”
The “Mars Madness,” or Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) to give it its official title, makes India one of four (the US, the EU and Russia being the other three) that have ventured to our closest cosmic neighbor, and constitutes a conspicuously extravagant part of what economist-activist Jean Dreze describes as “the Indian elite’s delusional quest for superpower status.” Competition and nationalism drive such escapades, not the quest for knowledge and understanding. The space race between the US and the Soviet Union for example, “was not an affordable luxury undertaken for the sake of knowledge, but intrinsically tied to the military-industrial complex,” The Guardian rightly states. India’s primary competitor in all things economic is that other mammoth nation, China. The Chinese space program is advanced (in 2012, it put a Chinese woman in space and last year, launched its first un-crewed lunar mission), and therefore intensely intimidating to the Indian nationalists’ psyche.
This stellar statement of Indian virility (only men would instigate such a policy) represents the insanity permeating the political pantomime not only inside India but worldwide. While hundreds of millions in the sub-continent live impoverished, degrading lives, the Indian government is investing the nation’s income in sending a rocket to Mars! The Economist asks the collective question: “how [can] a country that cannot feed all of its people find the money for a Mars mission?” As well, we should add, as shelling out US $32 billions on defense each year, making India the world’s biggest arms importer with the fourth largest air force.
And yet India (that has its own overseas aid program worth £328 million a year) is still receiving international aid amounting to around US $1,600 millions (World Bank 2012 figures) a year – much of which flows from the coffers of nations (Britain and the USA, for example) that cannot – the politicians proclaim – invest adequately in public services or pay public sector workers a livable wage.
Rocket Science Versus Sanitation
A third of the world’s poor – that’s almost 1 billion people – are in India. And despite twenty years of so-called development, the World Bank(WB) records that not only has this number not diminished, but, “the absolute number of poor people in some of India’s poorest states actually increased during the last decade.” These marginalized men women and children live in rural India and, driven from their land by the commercialization of the countryside, the slums of the cities. In Mumbai alone – a city with a population of almost 21 million – two-thirds live in rambling slums.
It is estimated that as many as 68% of people (or 885 millions) in India are living on less than US $2 (the official World Bank poverty line) a day, over half of whom subsist on an income of under US $1 a day (WB). Surviving on such a pittance is virtually impossible: parents cannot feed their children or themselves every day, or pay for health care or education; families live in suffocating conditions, a family of five, six, seven perhaps, sleeps on the ground in one small room, which functions as kitchen, bedroom and living room. The majority of the population – over 50% – do not have the luxury of a toilet and are forced to defecate in public. In a recent report on worldwide sanitation, The World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF found that, “globally, India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practicing open defecation.”
Perhaps some of the 16,000 scientists and engineers working on the space programme could be employed to design and install a nationwide sanitation system.
The needs and indeed rights of the marginalized masses who are primarily from the scheduled castes, the Adivasi (indigenous) and Dalit (previously referred to as “untouchables”) groups, are consistently abused and ignored. State health care, for example, particularly in rural India, is virtually non-existent, the government spends a mere 1.2% of GDP on public health, which as The Economist says, is “dismally low” (Afghanistan, for example, spends 8.7%; the Democratic Republic of Congo, 5.6% [WB 2012 figures]). In fact, I could find no country in the world that spends less. The truth is that the ruling elite care not for those living in abject destitution; they are an embarrassment to the Delhi/Mumbai set, the billionaires (India has 66 of the world’s richest), multi-millionaires and comfortable middle class who are desperate for India to be recognized as a shiny democratic consumer state, albeit a violent unjust nationalistic one. A Hindu state thrusting itself into the global limelight, with a strong army – powerful enough to crush and intimidate its own people – and a US $1 billion a year (a figure worth repeating) space program to rival other superpower contenders. It is the polluted image of a divided nation, ruled by an uncompassionate, materialistically driven Hindu minority that would shame the vision of the Father of the Nation.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.