A Boston nonprofit, Lawyers for Civil Rights (LCR), filed a lawsuit on behalf of multiple Black and Latinx community groups on Monday, alleging that legacy admissions at Harvard University violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The parties being represented in the lawsuit — the Chica Project, the African Community Economic Development of New England, and the Greater Boston Latino Network — have requested that the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights open an investigation into the disparate impact of Harvard’s use of donor and legacy preferences. They have also called for officials to declare such admissions a violation of Title VI and to order Harvard to end the practice.
“Why are we rewarding children for privileges and advantages accrued by prior generations?” said Ivan Espinoza-Madrigal, LCR’s executive director. “Your family’s last name and the size of your bank account are not a measure of merit, and should have no bearing on the college admissions process.”
The complaint draws on data that came to light amid the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturn of affirmative action last week, which effectively curtailed colleges’ ability to consider race in their admissions processes, likely making it harder for thousands of marginalized students to access higher education.
“There’s no birthright to Harvard. As the Supreme Court recently noted, ‘eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it,’” Espinoza-Madrigal said. “There should be no way to identify who your parents are in the college application process.”
In a statement about the lawsuit, LCR contended that the Supreme Court’s ruling makes it “even more imperative now to eliminate policies that systematically disadvantage students of color.”
The records uncovered during the affirmative action case showed that donor-related applicants to Harvard University were nearly seven times more likely to be admitted than non-donor related applicants, and that legacy candidates were more than six times more likely to be admitted. Nearly 70 percent of Harvard donor-related and legacy applicants are white.
“Harvard’s practice of giving a leg-up to the children of wealthy donors and alumni — who have done nothing to deserve it — must end,” said Michael Kippins, Litigation Fellow at LCR. “This preferential treatment overwhelmingly goes to white applicants and harms efforts to diversify.”
About 28 percent of the Harvard class of 2019 were legacy admissions and only 57 percent of white students who were admitted were admitted on merit.
“Qualified and highly deserving applicants of color are harmed as a result, as admissions slots are given instead to the overwhelmingly white applicants who benefit from Harvard’s legacy and donor preferences,” LCR said in a statement.
In recent years, numerous colleges and universities — including all higher education institutions in Colorado; the University of California; Johns Hopkins University; and Amherst College — have abandoned the practice of prioritizing donor-related and legacy applicants after finding the practice to be unfair. LCR hopes that this lawsuit will set a precedent to end legacy admissions at all universities.
“If the federal probe into the civil rights implications of donor and legacy admissions comes down our way … then we will see not just a change at Harvard but at other institutions as well,” said Espinoza-Madrigal on Boston Public Radio. “And so this will have a domino effect.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 143 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy