Skip to content Skip to footer

Latest Trump Effort to End DACA Invalidated by Federal Judge

The Trump administration is now unlikely to further address DACA and the fate of Dreamers.

People hold signs during a rally in support of the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, in San Diego, California, June 18, 2020.

A federal judge said Saturday that Chad Wolf was not legally serving as acting homeland security chief when he issued a July memo limiting protections under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, so the memo is invalid.

“This is a victory for our courageous plaintiffs, DACA-eligible youth across the country, and all of our communities,” Trudy S. Rebert, staff attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, said in a statement.

The July 28, 2020 memorandum, which included a bar on accepting new applications for DACA — which protects undocumented people in the U.S. who arrived in the country as children — by first-time applicants, “was not an exercise of legal authority,” Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York wrote.

From the Associated Press:

In Garaufis’ ruling Saturday, the judge wrote that DHS didn’t follow an order of succession established when then-Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned in April 2019. Kevin McAleenan, who succeeded Nielsen until he resigned in October 2019, also didn’t have statutory authority to hold the position, Garaufis wrote.

Karen Tumlin, one of the lawyers in the case and director of the Justice Action Center, broke down the ruling’s implications:

“The ruling is another defeat for the Trump administration, which is now unlikely to be able to address DACA and the fate of Dreamers,” CNN noted. The outlet added:

The administration tried ending the program in 2017, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked their attempt in June. The memo invalidated on Saturday had sought to buy time while the administration decided its next steps.

Tumlin, in a statement, pointed to the unwavering determination of the Trump administration — which includes immigration hardliner Stephen Miller — to attack the Obama-era program.

“After the June Supreme Court victory, the Trump administration was bound to reset the DACA program to its original terms from 2012,” said Tumlin. “Rather than doing that, the Trump administration gutted the program again — locking out young people who had been waiting years to apply and severely curtailing the program for existing DACA recipients,” said Tumlin, adding that Congress must “pass permanent protections for these immigrant youth.”

President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to protect so-called Dreamers, but immigrant rights groups still see much work ahead.

“As we look forward to a Biden administration, we know this victory is just the beginning,” said Javier. H. Valdés, co-executive director of Make the Road New York, an organizational plaintiff in the case.

“Not only must the new administration immediately protect DACA and [Temporary Protected Status] holders and reverse all of Trump’s nativist polices,” he said, “but also provide swift relief and a path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented families across this country.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.