In response to the owner of the Los Angeles Times decreeing that the paper would not be endorsing a candidate in this year’s presidential race, Mariel Garza, the editor of editorials for the Times, has resigned from her position.
Health tech billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong, who bought the Times in 2018, told staff at the paper on October 11 that, while the editorial board could issue endorsements in lower ballot races, it could not endorse either Democratic candidate Kamala Harris or Republican candidate Donald Trump in the presidential race, marking the first time the paper hasn’t made a presidential endorsement since 2004.
The paper has backed Democratic candidates in every presidential election since that time.
In response to that order, Mariel Garza, who oversees the editorial board and the opinion section for the paper, resigned from her role in protest.
“I want to make it clear that I am not okay with us being silent. In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up,” Garza said in a phone conversation with Sewell Chan of the Columbia Journalism Review.
Within her resignation letter, Garza said that the paper was planning to endorse Harris and that it was difficult to justify not releasing an endorsement when the paper’s editorial board had made the case against a second Trump term in previous commentaries.
“How could we spend eight years railing against Trump and the danger his leadership poses to the country and then fail to endorse the perfectly decent Democrat challenger — who we previously endorsed for the U.S. Senate?” Garza wondered.
She added:
The non-endorsement undermines the integrity of the editorial board and every single endorsement we make, down to school board races. People will justifiably wonder if each endorsement was a decision made by a group of journalists after extensive research and discussion, or through decree by the owner.
In her conversation with Chan, Garza explained that it was important for the paper to outline its stance, even if readers could presume their position.
“This is a point in time where you speak your conscience no matter what,” Garza said.
After Garza’s resignation, Soon-Shiong posted on social media that he had invited the board to “draft a factual analysis of all the POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE policies by EACH candidate during their tenures at the White House, and how these policies affected the nation.” He claimed that he ultimately accepted the board’s decision not to do so.
Garza rejected that notion, pointing out: “What he outlines in that tweet is not an endorsement, or even an editorial.”
Garza’s fears about the non-endorsement undermining the Times’s previous statements on Trump came to fruition later this week, when the Trump campaign seized on the paper’s refusal to issue a statement to falsely suggest they had qualms endorsing Harris.
“In Kamala’s own home state, the Los Angeles Times — the state’s largest newspaper — has declined to endorse the Harris-Walz ticket, despite endorsing the Democrat nominees in every election for decades,” the campaign bragged, purporting that “even her fellow Californians know she’s not up for the job.”
(In reality, polling data shows that Harris is leading Trump in the state by a huge margin — an aggregate of polls compiled by FiveThirtyEight, for example, shows her ahead of him by nearly 24 points.)
Soon-Shiong’s demand that the Times refrain from issuing a presidential endorsement has prompted many observers to question whether he hopes to capitalize on either candidate’s win. Indeed, Soon-Shiong has worked with the Biden administration on its cancer initiative and discussed the future of health care with Trump when he won the election in 2016. Soon-Shiong’s friendship with fellow billionaire (and Trump megadonor) Elon Musk has also called his motives into question.
“He thinks that Trump is going to win, and he doesn’t need to make an enemy,” said one former reporter, in comments to The Wrap about Garza’s resignation.
Notably, while Soon-Shiong promotes himself as a philanthropist, a Politico analysis in 2017 found that his supposed philanthropy often benefits his own companies. Indeed, a majority of the grants from Soon-Shiong’s organization were awarded to companies or entities that he himself owned, the report pointed out.
“The abuse is taking money that is supposed to be irrevocably dedicated to charitable purposes … and using it for other, self-benefiting purposes,” Lloyd Mayer, a Notre Dame law professor, told Politico at the time.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.