Opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline rally in Whitefish, Mont., earlier this month. (Photo: 350.org / Flickr)
Local landowners and environmentalists who have long opposed the pipeline project are celebrating the decision.
The Keystone XL pipeline project suffered a major setback this week with a Nebraska court ruling that will likely delay any final decision on the pipeline for at least another six months.
The District Court judge ruled in favor of three landowners—Randy Thompson, Susan Luebbe, and Susan Dunavan—who challenged a Nebraska law granting Gov. Dave Heineman and state environmental regulators special authority to approve pipeline projects. The governor used this new authority to approve Keystone XL’s passage through the state, despite opposition from landowner and environmental groups.
President Obama had been expected to make a decision on the pipeline at some point this summer or later. Now, the already contentious process is on hold. If the pipeline is again approved in Nebraska, it will likely go through a lengthy rerouting process before going back to the president for a final decision.
Dave Domina, the attorney who represented the landowners, said in a news release that the pipeline company TransCanada now “has no approved route in Nebraska. TransCanada is not authorized to condemn the property against Nebraska landowners. The pipeline project is at standstill in this state.”
TransCanada’s spokesperson, Shawn Howard, told Bloomberg news in an email that “we are disappointed and disagree with the decision,” and are deciding what steps to take next.
Jane Kleeb of Bold Nebraska, a citizen advocacy group, was encouraged by the ruling. “This clearly gives a boost to landowners and citizens,” she said, groups that had worked to challenge what she called the governor’s “illegal process.”
The Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport tar sands crude from Alberta to refineries in east Texas, has already been delayed by at least two years—due to legal challenges like this one, but also by a grassroots environmental campaign on a scale not seen since the anti-nuclear protests of the 1970s. Some landowners were particularly vocal in their opposition, noting that tar sands are more likely to spill than regular crude oil and thus pose a greater threat to land and water.
Kleeb hopes that landowners and citizens in other states along the Keystone XL route will take courage from the ruling. “If we stick together, and if we show that we can outlast all other lobbying and PR campaigns, then it is possible to win.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy