Oakland, California, is a haven for social justice. When we see injustice, we take to the streets. I’ve attended numerous protests over the years — from Black Lives Matter rallies to disruptions of Trump speeches. Until recently, the most violence I had faced was at the Trump rally where attendees railed against me as a queer woman of color. On Monday May 30, 2016, though, I met violence at a very different sort of event: a Bernie Sanders rally. More than a dozen of my fellow activists with Direct Action Everywhere (DxE) and I attempted to access the stage to hoist a banner, the sort of nonviolent action that has been used by numerous movements and which Bernie Sanders says he supports. Instead, we were manhandled and one of us beaten by the Secret Service. Why? The banner called for a group that is conspicuously overlooked by progressives — nonhuman animals.
Bernie says he is progressive, but it’s hard to advocate the ideals underlying progressivism in a way that does not support animal rights. If we believe in equality and freedom from violence, then if a being suffers the same as we do, we have no reason to treat that suffering any differently. Scientists, as enshrined in the 2012 “Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness,” assure us that the animals we eat largely suffer the same. The view that animals deserve equal respect is no longer a fringe view: 32 percent of Americans now support equal rights for nonhuman animals. Yet Sanders has never touched on this issue, and his record suggests why. Sanders has an intimate relationship with agribusiness, accepting over $300,000 in this campaign and aggressively supporting outdated subsidies for the dairy industry. True, Hillary Clinton also receives support from agribusiness, but as the most progressive candidate in the race, it is Bernie’s job to speak out.
Increasingly, the answer to the plea for animal rights is to call for higher animal welfare. This, though, is a shell game. Friends of mine who have gone into the most “humane” farms in the country — suppliers to Whole Foods, for instance — have found conditions resembling those on factory farms. I have personally seen a backyard hen named Soyrizo suffer from the same woes as industrial hens, wincing in pain as she endured an impacted ovary from excessive egg production. After seeing the violence that greets animals on even the best farm, I have concluded that we need more than piecemeal reform — we need legal personhood and rights for all animals, and we need our candidates to call for that. Animals are currently treated like objects; they need to be treated as rights-holders.
I don’t believe that Bernie Sanders or other progressives who ignore animals mean harm. People of conscience are pacified by misleading welfare standards offered by corporations and governments. Deep down, though, we do not believe it is okay to kill our dogs and cats. What’s different about chickens or pigs?
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 7 days to add 432 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.