A journalist was forcibly removed from a press conference being held by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) on Thursday when the reporter asked the lawmaker why he still opposed a commission to investigate the violence that took place at the U.S. Capitol building earlier this year.
The press conference, which took place in Florida, was addressing issues related to Cuba. McCarthy had just finished a response in which he said Cuban leaders had created tyranny for people in the island nation.
Grant Stern, a radio broadcaster and executive director of the progressive organization Occupy Democrats, then asked McCarthy a question related to democratic freedoms.
“Minority leader, you said that the … revolution created tyranny on the island of Cuba and I am asking you a question,” Stern asked. “It’s not a Democratic or Republican issue, so why do you oppose the January 6th commission, sir?”
But midway through that question, Stern appeared to be forcibly removed from the press conference, as video posted by Stern showed on social media. According to Stern, four police officers, prompted by McCarthy’s staffers, physically lifted him out of the room as he was asking McCarthy his query.
I tried to ask @GOPLeader McCarthy a question after he decried Cuban police pickup up people in the streets.
Why does he oppose the bipartisan #January6thCommission?
A Congressional staffer had four cops pick me up and drag me from the room.
I still asked the question. pic.twitter.com/HDqrhvARaC
— Grant Stern (@grantstern) August 5, 2021
In an email to The Independent, Stern said he couldn’t “understand why” McCarthy was discussing “freedom to hold elections in Cuba,” but was unable to discuss the January 6 attack on the Capitol by loyalists to former President Donald Trump, which was an attempt to disrupt the certification of the United States’ 2020 elections.
The journalist also questioned why McCarthy didn’t stand up for Stern’s own democratic freedoms in the press conference itself.
“When he saw me being dragged away, why didn’t he speak up and stop it?” Stern asked.
McCarthy has taken a firm position against investigating the events of January 6, but he didn’t always hold this opinion. Days after the attack on the Capitol, in which five individuals lost their lives, the House Minority Leader, though opposed to impeaching Trump, said the president he played a role in the violence of that day.
Trump “bears responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters,” McCarthy said in comments he made on the House floor. “He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding.”
In the same speech, he also called for the formation of a “fact-finding commission” to investigate what happened, rather than taking steps to impeach Trump.
In the months since those comments, however, McCarthy has drastically altered his position, opposing the formation of a commission at every turn. In May, for instance, McCarthy opposed a bipartisan plan to form a commission, which would have allowed for an equal number of Democrats and Republicans to take part.
After that plan was blocked in the Senate by a Republican filibuster, McCarthy then opposed, through his various actions, the creation of a select committee formed by Democrats in the House.
McCarthy has also peddled falsehoods and disinformation about the attack on the Capitol. In recent weeks, he has wrongly claimed that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California) is to blame for what happened that day, arguing she had not secured the Capitol well enough during the certification process.
Pelosi is not in charge of the security of the Capitol building, as numerous media fact checks have noted.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.