I knew Christine O’Donnell as an ideologue of uptightness — with a fervent position on every issue under the sun. I saw her up close when we debated during one of her several Phil Donahue show appearances in 2002-03 on MSNBC, where I worked as an on-air contributor and Donahue senior producer.
Like Sarah Palin, O’Donnell has that dangerous mix of arrogance and ignorance. Years before there was a Tea Party to put her in orbit, O’Donnell was already adept at blending paranoia about Democrats with blind faith in religious and market fundamentalism.
But even in the dark days of Bushmania eight years ago, I could not have foreseen this foe of masturbation and friend of for-profit healthcare as a serious U.S. senate contender.
During a Donahue discussion on the rumor that Bill Clinton might host a syndicated daytime TV talkshow, O’Donnell’s opposition went beyond her complaint that it’s “so undignified”:
O’DONNELL: One reason I care is because it’s also a threat to our national security.
DONAHUE: How’s that?
O’DONNELL: You mentioned what is he going to do when the ratings start to fall? Well, he’s got access to classified information that Anna Nicole Smith [then hosting a TV show] does not . . . So do you really think the networks are going to sacrifice ratings for the sake of not revealing information that he has?
After acknowledging that she “would certainly be a guest” on a Clinton talkshow, O’Donnell repeated her fear about “this classified data that he will have access to and that he will bring to the discussion.” It was so embarrassing that a fellow guest critical of a Clinton show had to chime in: “He’s not going to reveal state secrets on the show!”
In our joint appearance on Donahue in November 2002, a panel debated big and small news, including the Michael Jackson baby-dangling incident. “Perhaps one thing they can do is revoke his passport,” she said, suggesting a Big Government approach.
Ironically, given the state of her race today, she expressed hope that Al Gore would be the 2004 Democratic nominee because he was somehow unelectable in the general election: “So let him be your front man, Democratic Party. And you guys will lose for sure.”
O’Donnell was a Tea Party candidate way before the party started — with a faux-populism quick to defend corporate interests. Years before the battle over Obamacare, she was already steeped in obstruction and fear of change.
The best antidote to hate speech and misinformation is truth. Click here to support real news.
O’DONNELL: And why do we want universal health care?
COHEN: I guess you’re not one of the 40 million people that has no health insurance, are you?
O’DONNELL: Because — No, actually I don’t have health insurance right now.
COHEN: And you think that’s a good thing?
O’DONNELL: I pay out of my own pocket right now.
COHEN: We’re the only advanced industrial country that does not have health care.
O’DONNELL: Let me tell you. I would rather pay out of my own pocket than have to wait two hours for some shoddy doctor to give me a misdiagnosis. . . And pay more than half my wages in taxes to cover this. It’s ridiculous.
COHEN: We’re the wealthiest country in the world and we’ve got 40 million people without health insurance. There’s no advanced industrial country that has that.
O’DONNELL: And throwing money into something like is not going to help.
When she appeared on Donahue shows, O’Donnell represented The Savior’s Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT) — the youth group opposing pre-marital sex and intra-marital masturbation that she was apparently still associated with last year. On one episode, she repeatedly equated nudity with pornography.
On another show, she belittled an obesity suit against McDonald’s as frivolous (“what I want to know is, did the lawyer go to her or did she go to the lawyer?”), but O’Donnell famously and somewhat capriciously sued a rightwing nonprofit ex-employer for $6.9 million for wrongful termination.
In normal times, it would be hard to believe that a religious fundamentalist like Christine O’Donnell could be a triumphant major party nominee for U.S. senate. With the rise of Palin and Beck above their hordes of fearful and energized followers, these are clearly not normal times.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.