The House committee investigating the assault on the Capitol last Jan. 6 will probe former President Donald Trump’s phone calls to allies stationed at the Willard Hotel in Washington hours before the attack, committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., told The Guardian.
Thompson told the outlet that the panel cannot ask the National Archives for records of specific calls but plans to review White House phone records around the time of the attack in an effort to investigate specific calls Trump made to multiple allies seeking to block the certification of President Biden’s election victory.
“If we say we want all White House calls made on January 5 and 6, if he made it on a White House phone, then obviously we would look at it there,” Thompson said.
Trump has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the National Archives from turning over the records but has been rejected by every court that has heard his dubious argument that a former president can invoke executive privilege. He has appealed the case, however, to the heavily conservative Supreme Court.
“If we get the information that we requested, those calls potentially will be reflected to the Willard Hotel and whomever,” Thompson said.
The Guardian reported last month that in the late hours of Jan. 5 the then-president made several calls to a team led by Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman and Boris Ephsteyn, as well as former White House strategist Steve Bannon, to discuss ways to delay the certification of Biden’s win.
Trump complained that Vice President Mike Pence was reluctant to use his ceremonial role at the joint session of Congress called to certify electoral votes to alter or delay the final outcome. Trump also pressed allies on whether they could delay certification through a scheme in which Republican-led legislatures would send alternate slates of electors to Congress, with the aim of reversing Biden’s victories in key states, according to the report.
The committee has already issued subpoenas to Eastman and Bannon but both men have refused to comply with the investigation. Eastman has vowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment and sued the panel in an effort to block the subpoena. The Justice Department has charged Bannon with two counts of contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the panel’s requests. The committee is soon expected to issue a subpoena to Giuliani as well, according to the Guardian.
Trump called the lawyers and non-lawyers on his team at the Willard separately because Giuliani “did not want to have non-lawyers participate on sensitive calls and jeopardize claims to attorney-client privilege,” according to the report.
It’s unclear whether Giuliani, who led Trump’s legal efforts, plans to invoke attorney-client privilege in the investigation. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the committee and a former constitutional law professor, told the Guardian that the privilege does not grant Giuliani immunity.
“The attorney-client privilege does not operate to shield participants in a crime from an investigation into a crime,” he said. “If it did, then all you would have to do to rob a bank is bring a lawyer with you, and be asking for advice along the way.”
Trump and his allies have sought to stall the investigation, although some have cooperated with the probe. It’s not clear whether the committee is likely to glean useful information from phone records alone. Although Trump made multiple calls from the White House ahead of the Capitol riot, it’s unclear where he was when he called his allies at the Willard, or what phones he may have used. Phone calls placed from the White House residence, for instance, are not automatically stored in records sent to the National Archives, the Guardian report noted. Even if the committee obtains records showing that calls to the Willard occurred within the relevant time frame, investigators would still need testimony from people with knowledge of the calls to learn what was said on them.
The calls came a day after Eastman held a meeting with Trump, Pence and Pence’s chief of staff Marc Short to detail his plan to have Pence delay the certification of the results. Pence pushed back on the plan, which made Trump “furious,” according to the report.
Pence earlier this month declined to commit to cooperating with the committee’s investigation, but Short is complying with a subpoena from the panel, according to CNN. A source with knowledge of the situation told the outlet that the committee is getting “significant cooperation from Team Pence.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.