Skip to content Skip to footer

January 6 Committee Requests That Jim Jordan Speak With Them

Jordan is the second member of Congress that the select committee has requested to speak with.

Rep. Jim Jordan speaks to an aid during a House Judiciary Committee markup on Capitol Hill on June 17, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

The House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack has requested that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) appear before them to answer questions regarding his communications with former President Donald Trump.

The request is voluntary, meaning that Jordan isn’t required to appear by a subpoena. The January 6 commission wants Jordan to speak with its investigators sometime in the first two weeks of January, either at the Capitol or in his home district.

Jordan is the second member of the House of Representatives who has been asked to speak before the panel. Earlier this week, the commission asked Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania) to give a voluntary deposition, but Perry rejected the invitation.

Jordan, the ranking Republican member on the House Judiciary Committee, is a staunch Trump ally who was initially chosen by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) to serve on the January 6 commission, along with fellow Trump ally Rep. Jim Baker (R-Indiana). But Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California) rejected both of the lawmakers for spreading disinformation about the Capitol attack.

“With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,” Pelosi said in July.

In a letter sent to Jordan this week, commission chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) noted that Jordan was in constant communication with Trump in the months after the 2020 presidential election and on the day of the January 6 Capitol breach.

“We understand that you had at least one and possibly multiple communications with President Trump on January 6th. We would like to discuss each such communication with you in detail,” Thompson said, adding that the commission is also interested in communications from the day before the attack.

The commission is also seeking information about Jordan’s communications with Trump during the interim period between Election Day and January 6 — specifically discussions about overturning Trump’s election loss to President Joe Biden.

“Public reporting suggests that you may also have information about meetings with White House officials and the then-President in November and December 2020, and early-January 2021, about strategies for overturning the results of the 2020 election,” Thompson wrote.

Jordan has been inconsistent about how often he spoke with Trump on January 6, refusing to give straight answers to the question in television interviews. In July, shortly after Pelosi rejected him from serving on the commission, Jordan was asked in a Fox News interview whether he spoke with Trump on the day of the attack.

“Yes,” Jordan immediately responded. “I mean I’ve talked to the president so many, I can’t remember all the days I have talked to him, but I have certainly talked to the president.”

In the months after that interview, Jordan continued to waffle on the answer. In an interview in August, he said he spoke with Trump “more than once” on the day the Capitol was attacked. In a House Rules Committee hearing in October, however, Jordan said he only “may have talked to him.”

In November, Jordan was asked directly whether he would cooperate with the January 6 commission should they ask to speak with him.

“Depends on what it is [they want to talk about],” Jordan said. “I’m not going to answer hypothetical questions, but I just think this is a complete sham, what these guys are doing.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy