The House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol building will meet later this week to discuss its final report and the possibility of forwarding additional criminal referrals to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
The department is already investigating attempts by Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 presidential election. But criminal referrals from the committee may hold weight for the DOJ, as the committee could have evidence that the department hasn’t yet considered, including witness testimony.
A subcommittee of panel members will provide the broader committee with options to consider when it meets this Friday, including the option to forward criminal referrals to the Justice Department; such referrals could relate to obstruction of the committee’s work by outside individuals, possible perjury by witnesses or witness tampering by pro-Trump allies.
Vice chair of the committee Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming) noted at the end of a hearing in late June that several witnesses had reported that people in Trump’s circle had contacted them in attempts to “influence or impact their testimony.”
The January 6 committee will also consider on Friday whether to recommend that the DOJ charge five Republican lawmakers who refused to comply with subpoenas to give depositions to the panel. Among those lawmakers is House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy (California), the next presumptive Speaker of the House, who, along with his GOP allies, is expected to disband the committee when he assumes power over the chamber in January.
If the committee decides to recommend contempt of Congress charges against the five lawmakers, their recommendations would be subject to a full House vote before being sent to the DOJ.
The committee’s previous criminal referrals to the Justice Department have had varying levels of success. While the DOJ accepted the committee’s recommendation to press contempt of Congress charges against Trump’s former top political aide Steve Bannon, ultimately resulting in a successful prosecution, the department has disregarded other recommendations, including contempt of Congress charges against former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows.
Still, the committee could decide that it’s necessary to issue new recommendations, some of its members said.
“We will be discussing whether to make referrals, and if so on whom and for what,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California) said. “We are considering any offenses for which we have uncovered relevant evidence and think there is a basis for a referral.”
Schiff added that the committee’s referrals to the DOJ could include charges against Trump, though no decision on any individual has been made.
The committee will also be discussing aspects of its final report, which, according to committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi), could be released before the Christmas holiday, although it likely won’t be ready until at least December 16.
Thompson told reporters on Wednesday that the report will have eight chapters in total, and could include information that the committee has unearthed since its last public hearing. Members may hold a new public hearing to showcase revelations in the report that have not yet been disclosed, but they haven’t made definitive plans so far. Thompson added that the committee is wrapping up its work, noting that members face an end-of-year deadline due to the possibility that the committee will be dissolved by Republicans in January.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.