The select committee investigating the January 6 breach of the United States Capitol building has subpoenaed six more individuals, including a lawyer for Trump who helped craft a scheme to upend the Electoral College and the former president’s first National Security Advisor.
The January 6 commission believes these six individuals — all of whom were associated with Trump’s campaign and his so-called “Stop the Steal” movement — can provide insight into Trump’s motivations in the days leading up to a mob of his loyalists attacking the Capitol.
- John Eastman, a Trump lawyer who crafted a memo that sought to have then-Vice President Mike Pence refuse to count certain states’ electors in the Electoral College in order to hand the presidency to Trump for a second term;
- Michael Flynn, Trump’s first National Security Advisor whom the former president pardoned over “any and all possible offenses” arising from the Robert Mueller-led Russia probe, and whom the commission believes was involved in meetings with Trump over how to promote lies about election fraud;
- Jason Miller, a former senior campaign adviser who served as spokesperson for Trump after he exited office;
- Bernard Kerik, the disgraced former New York City police commissioner — also granted a pardon by Trump — who attended a meeting at the Willard Hotel focused on overturning the election;
- Bill Stepien, Trump’s 2020 campaign manager who oversaw the campaign’s transition to the “Stop the Steal” strategy;
- And Angela McCallum, national executive assistant to Trump’s reelection campaign.
The January 6 commission is asking for documents from these six individuals and requesting that they give closed- door testimony to commission investigators starting at the end of November through mid-December.
The activities of these six individuals are key to understanding what led up to the attack on the Capitol, commission vice chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) said.
“In the days before the Jan. 6 attack, the former president’s closest allies and advisers drove a campaign of misinformation about the election and planned ways to stop the count of Electoral College votes,” Thompson said in a statement. “The select committee needs to know every detail about their efforts to overturn the election, including who they were talking to in the White House and in Congress, what connections they had with rallies that escalated into a riot and who paid for it all.”
This latest round of subpoenas brings the total number of subpoenas issued to 25, although more than 150 witnesses have testified before investigators so far, most without the need for such orders. The six individuals subpoenaed on Monday seem to indicate that the commission is focusing on strategy sessions held by Trump and his inner circle to overturn the election results.
“They are really honing in on this strategy at the Willard Hotel,” Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney and current law professor at the University of Michigan, said to The New York Times. “If it’s a campaign war room, that’s one thing. But the question is: To what extent are they looking at blocking the certification of the election?”
Eastman’s testimony about his scheme to help Trump overturn the Electoral College results will be of great concern, McQuade added.
“The Eastman memo is a real smoking gun. It really appears to be a concerted effort here,” she said.
It’s likely that the subpoenas will be challenged, either by Trump himself or by those receiving them, as the subpoenaed individuals represent some of Trump’s most loyal confidantes. Flynn, for instance, was steadfast in his refusal to cooperate with the Mueller investigation, even when facing the possibility of a long prison sentence.
The matter will likely be tied up in the courts, as Trump has already sued to have other former aides’ testimonies blocked by making dubious claims of executive privilege — a right conferred to presidents that many legal experts believe Trump no longer has as a former chief executive.
Although the lawsuits may not rest on sound legal ground, many say that isn’t the point. Rather, challenging the ability of Trump associates to testify is likely a delay tactic meant to “run out the clock” on the January 6 commission’s work up to the 2022 midterm elections, when Republicans may take control of Congress.
Trump is using the courts “to delay, try to prevent the country from learning about his corruption,” commission member Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California) said last month. “Donald Trump will lose this litigation, and he knows he’ll lose the litigation. The point isn’t winning, the point is delaying.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 242 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy